Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27814027›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of pharmacology and toxicology2017

Harnessing Big Data for Systems Pharmacology.

Lei Xie, Eli J Draizen, Philip E Bourne

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Exploring the Mechanism of Icariin in Osteoporosis Based on a Network Pharmacology Strategy.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Drug Research Meets Network Science: Where Are We?Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2020
    Article
  9. Big Data and Artificial Intelligence Modeling for Drug Discovery.Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Network Pharmacology Analysis ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Whither systems medicine?Experimental & molecular medicine · 2018
    Review
  19. Automating drug discovery.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lei XieDepartment of Computer Science, Hunter College, The City University of New York, New York, NY 10065; email: lei.xie@hunter.cuny.edu.
Eli J DraizenNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20894; email: philip.bourne@nih.gov.
Philip E BourneNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20894; email: philip.bourne@nih.gov.

Funding

Drug discovery by integrating chemical genomics and structural systems biologyR01LM011986 · NLM · HUNTER COLLEGE · PI BRINKMAN, FIONA, BURLEY, STEPHEN K · 2014 to 2017
$1.2M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011986
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systems pharmacology aims to holistically understand mechanisms of drug actions to support drug discovery and clinical practice. Systems pharmacology modeling (SPM) is data driven. It integrates an exponentially growing amount of data at multiple scales (genetic, molecular, cellular, organismal, and environmental). The goal of SPM is to develop mechanistic or predictive multiscale models that are interpretable and actionable. The current explosions in genomics and other omics data, as well as the tremendous advances in big data technologies, have already enabled biologists to generate novel hypotheses and gain new knowledge through computational models of genome-wide, heterogeneous, and dynamic data sets. More work is needed to interpret and predict a drug response phenotype, which is dependent on many known and unknown factors. To gain a comprehensive understanding of drug actions, SPM requires close collaborations between domain experts from diverse fields and integration of heterogeneous models from biophysics, mathematics, statistics, machine learning, and semantic webs. This creates challenges in model management, model integration, model translation, and knowledge integration. In this review, we discuss several emergent issues in SPM and potential solutions using big data technology and analytics. The concurrent development of high-throughput techniques, cloud computing, data science, and the semantic web will likely allow SPM to be findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable, reliable, interpretable, and actionable.

Indexed as

Data Interpretation, StatisticalAnimalsDatabases, FactualHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansPharmacology, ClinicalSystems Biologycloud computingcomputational modelingdata sciencemachine learningNIH Commonssemantic websystems biologysystems pharmacology modeling

Identifiers

PMID27814027
PMCPMC5626567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.