ArticleGenetic epidemiology2016
Mendelian randomization analysis of a time-varying exposure for binary disease outcomes using functional data analysis methods.
Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Methodological approaches, challenges, and opportunities in the application of Mendelian randomisation to lifecourse epidemiology: A systematic literature review.European journal of epidemiology · 2024Pooled it
- FA-MFMR: a multivariable functional Mendelian randomization method that accounts for correlated longitudinal exposures via factor augmentation.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Modelling time-varying genetic effects on binary disease risk via functional Mendelian randomization.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Elevated interleukin-36γ and gene polymorphisms implicate novel risk in essential hypertension.Immunogenetics · 2026Article
- Repeated measures of physical activity before dementia diagnosis in community-dwelling older adults: a longitudinal study.The lancet. Healthy longevity · 2026Article
- A structural mean modeling Mendelian randomization approach to investigate the lifecourse effect of adiposity: applied and methodological considerations.American journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Longitudinal omics data analysis: approaches and applications.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- Time-resolved Mendelian randomization detects substantial variation in the detrimental effect of obesity throughout life.Science advances · 2025Article
- ti-scMR: trajectory-inference-based dynamic single-cell Mendelian randomization identifies causal genes underlying phenotypic differences.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Estimating Time-Varying Exposure Effects Through Continuous-Time Modelling in Mendelian Randomization.Statistics in medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Interpretation of Mendelian randomization using a single measure of an exposure that varies over time.International journal of epidemiology · 2022Article
- Strengthening Causal Inference in Exposomics Research: Application of Genetic Data and Methods.Environmental health perspectives · 2022Article
- Landmark mediation survival analysis using longitudinal surrogate.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Functional principal component based landmark analysis for the effects of longitudinal cholesterol profiles on the risk of coronary heart disease.Statistics in medicine · 2021Article
- Smoking and multiple sclerosis risk: a Mendelian randomization study.Journal of neurology · 2020Article
- Software Application Profile: PHESANT: a tool for performing automated phenome scans in UK Biobank.International journal of epidemiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis is performed to analyze the causal effect of an exposure variable on a disease outcome in observational studies, by using genetic variants that affect the disease outcome only through the exposure variable. This method has recently gained popularity among epidemiologists given the success of genetic association studies. Many exposure variables of interest in epidemiological studies are time varying, for example, body mass index (BMI). Although longitudinal data have been collected in many cohort studies, current MR studies only use one measurement of a time-varying exposure variable, which cannot adequately capture the long-term time-varying information. We propose using the functional principal component analysis method to recover the underlying individual trajectory of the time-varying exposure from the sparsely and irregularly observed longitudinal data, and then conduct MR analysis using the recovered curves. We further propose two MR analysis methods. The first assumes a cumulative effect of the time-varying exposure variable on the disease risk, while the second assumes a time-varying genetic effect and employs functional regression models. We focus on statistical testing for a causal effect. Our simulation studies mimicking the real data show that the proposed functional data analysis based methods incorporating longitudinal data have substantial power gains compared to standard MR analysis using only one measurement. We used the Framingham Heart Study data to demonstrate the promising performance of the new methods as well as inconsistent results produced by the standard MR analysis that relies on a single measurement of the exposure at some arbitrary time point.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.