Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27813016›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2017

Evaluating Trends in the Volume-Outcomes Relationship Following Liver Surgery: Does Regionalization Benefit All Patients the Same?

Faiz Gani, Daniel Azoulay, Timothy M Pawlik

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Trends in Textbook Outcomes over Time: Are Optimal Outcomes Following Complex Gastrointestinal Surgery for Cancer Increasing?Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Utilization of High-Volume Hospitals for High-Risk Cancer Surgery in California Following Medicaid Expansion.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Article
  10. Travel Patterns among Patients Undergoing Hepatic Resection in California: Does Driving Further for Care Improve Outcomes?Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Association Between Travel Distance, Hospital Volume, and Outcomes Following Resection of Cholangiocarcinoma.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. LIVER RESECTION IN BRAZIL: A NATIONAL SURVEY.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Hospital Volume and the Costs Associated with Surgery for Pancreatic Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2017
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Faiz GaniDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Daniel AzoulayDepartment of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Henri Mondor Hospital, Unite ISERM 955, Creteil, France.
Timothy M PawlikDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. tim.pawlik@osumc.edu.
Johns Hopkins University · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionData evaluating trends in hospital volume are lacking. The current study sought to examine trends in outcomes relative to hospital volume following liver surgery.

methodsA total of 14,296 patients >18 years undergoing an elective liver resection (LR) for cancer were identified using the National Inpatient Sample from 2001 to 2011. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to compare postoperative morbidity and mortality relative to hospital volume over time.

resultsOver time, the proportion of patients undergoing a LR at a high-volume hospital (HVH) increased from 24.4 to 45.0 %, while the proportion of patients undergoing a LR at a low-volume hospital (LVH) decreased from 40.4 to 22.7 %. On multivariable analysis, patients undergoing a LR at high-volume hospitals demonstrated a 29 % lower odds of mortality (OR = 0.71, 95 % CI = 0.59-0.86, p < 0.001) compared with patients undergoing a LR at a LVH. The rate of regionalization, however, was not equal among all patients as older patients, patients belonging to a racial minority, and those presenting with substantial comorbidity were less likely to undergo a LR at a HVH.

conclusionAn increase in the regionalization of liver surgery was observed over time. Trends in regionalization were, however, associated with discrepancies in access to HVH among specific patient populations.

Indexed as

AgedElective Surgical ProceduresFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHepatectomyHospital MortalityHospitals, High-VolumeHospitals, Low-VolumeHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesLiverTrendsVolume-outcomes

Identifiers

PMID27813016
OpenAlexW2546437349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.