Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27812918›Full record

ReviewJournal of genetic counseling2017

Theories for Psychotherapeutic Genetic Counseling: Fuzzy Trace Theory and Cognitive Behavior Theory.

Barbara Biesecker, Jehannine Austin, Colleen Caleshu

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of genetic counseling, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Information, communication, and cancer patients' trust in the physician: what challenges do we have to face in an era of precision cancer medicine?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Genetic Counseling and the Central Tenets of Practice.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Barbara BieseckerNational Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, NHGRI/NIH, 31 Center Drive, Rm B1 B36, Bethesda, MD, 20897-2073, USA. barbarab@mail.nih.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9665-8963
Jehannine AustinUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Colleen CaleshuStanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Funding

Interventions in Genetic CounselingZIAHG200317 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BIESECKER, BARBARA BOWLES · 2009 to 2018
$7.6M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 HG999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychotherapeutic genetic counseling is an increasingly relevant practice description. In this paper we aim to demonstrate how psychotherapeutic genetic counseling can be achieved by using psychological theories to guide one's approach to working with clients. We describe two illustrative examples, fuzzy trace theory and cognitive behavior theory, and apply them to two challenging cases. The theories were partially derived from evidence of beneficial client outcomes using a psychotherapeutic approach to patient care in other settings. We aim to demonstrate how these two specific theories can inform psychotherapeutic genetic counseling practice, and use them as examples of how to take a psychological theory and effectively apply it to genetic counseling.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyPsychological TheoryAdultFemaleGenetic CounselingHumansMaleMiddle AgedCognitive behavior therapyFuzzy trace theoryGenetic counselingPsychotherapeutic genetic counselingShared decision making

Identifiers

PMID27812918
PMCPMC5383519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.