Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27812808›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2017

The Value of Internet Tools in Undergraduate Surgical Education: Perspective of Medical Students in a Developing Country.

S O Ekenze, C I Okafor, O S Ekenze, J N Nwosu, U F Ezepue

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. An Online, Modular Curriculum Enhances Surgical Education and Improves Learning Outcomes in East, Central, and Southern Africa:Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2022
    Article
  6. Design of a Novel Online, Modular, Flipped-classroom Surgical Curriculum for East, Central, and Southern Africa.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

S O EkenzeDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Enugu Campus, Enugu, Nigeria. sebekenze@gmail.com.
C I OkaforDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Enugu Campus, Enugu, Nigeria.
O S EkenzeDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Enugu Campus, Enugu, Nigeria.
J N NwosuDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Enugu Campus, Enugu, Nigeria.
U F EzepueDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Enugu Campus, Enugu, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAdvances in information technology (IT) in the past decade present opportunities and challenges in undergraduate surgical education. There may be need to evaluate the knowledge base and the use of Internet tools among medical students in settings where traditional mode of education is preeminent. This may help to establish a conceptual framework for integrating e-learning into the traditional teaching to enhance learning experience. In this study, we evaluated the medical students' knowledge and use of Internet tools, and their opinion on the application of these tools in surgical education.

methodsWe undertook a cross-sectional survey of 2013 and 2014 graduating medical class of College of Medicine University of Nigeria, Enugu using structured self-administered questionnaire. The survey assessed the knowledge, utility, and application of Internet tools in surgical education using 5-point Likert scale.

resultsOverall response rate was 78% (227/291) comprising 151 (66.5%) males and 76 (33.5%) females. The median age was 24 years (range 20-33 years). Although 106 (46.7%) had formal training on information technology, 223 (98.2%) can access Internet, and 162 (71.4%) use one or more of the Internet tools, 90.6% (96/106) of those trained on ICT use Internet for education/learning compared to 88.4% (107/121) of those without ICT training (p = 0.76). Google™ search tool had the highest rating in terms of familiarity and utility for education/learning (mean rating 4.3 on a scale of 5.0), while Skype™ had the least rating (mean 2.0). Overall, 89% of respondents (mean rating 4.5 on a scale of 5.0) indicated that Internet tools could be effectively applied in surgical education specifically in areas of lectures, assignments, real-time procedure demonstration, case discussion, and interaction with surgical experts. The key benefits are utility as a regular self-assessment tool (mean rating = 4.6) and offer of flexible learning schedule (mean rating = 4.0). Fifty-two percent (118/227) strongly agree that combination of the use of Internet tools with the traditional teaching may give better learning outcome (mean rating 4.44). The major challenges were cost of accessing Internet (n = 126; 55.5%), lack of facility with the technology (n = 115; 50.7%), and network availability (n = 96; 42.3%). Availability of affordable Internet (n = 205; 90.3%), improvement of training on ICT (n = 135; 59.5%), and encouragement of the use of these tools by faculty (n = 107; 47.1%) were the major suggestions to address the challenges.

conclusionIn our setting, a substantial number of undergraduate medical students are familiar with and use Internet tools for learning and believe that the tools may have utility in surgical education. However, to further consolidate and enhance learning experience, it may be useful to integrate this learning modality with the traditional mode of teaching through a well thought out curriculum modification.

Indexed as

Students, MedicalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDeveloping CountriesEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleGeneral SurgeryHumansInternetMaleNigeriaProblem-Based LearningProgrammed Instructions as TopicSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.