Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27812804›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2017

Paediatric antibiotic prescriptions in primary care in the Alpes-Maritimes area of southeastern France between 2008 and 2013.

P Touboul-Lundgren, P Bruno, L Bailly, B Dunais, C Pradier

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Safety and Dose-Dependent Effects ofChildren (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  5. Consumption of antibiotics by children in Greece: a cross-sectional study.International journal of pediatrics & adolescent medicine · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

P Touboul-LundgrenPublic Health Department, Hôpital Archet 1, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, 151, Rte St Antoine de Ginestière, CS 23079 - 06202, Nice Cedex 3, France.
P BrunoPublic Health Department, Hôpital Archet 1, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, 151, Rte St Antoine de Ginestière, CS 23079 - 06202, Nice Cedex 3, France.
L BaillyPublic Health Department, Hôpital Archet 1, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, 151, Rte St Antoine de Ginestière, CS 23079 - 06202, Nice Cedex 3, France.
B DunaisPublic Health Department, Hôpital Archet 1, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, 151, Rte St Antoine de Ginestière, CS 23079 - 06202, Nice Cedex 3, France. dunais@club-internet.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3774-2318
C PradierPublic Health Department, Hôpital Archet 1, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, 151, Rte St Antoine de Ginestière, CS 23079 - 06202, Nice Cedex 3, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

France has remained among the top five European countries for ambulatory antibiotic consumption since such monitoring began in 1998. Young children are major antibiotic consumers, in spite of the viral origin of most infections in this population. Recommendations were updated in 2011 to limit prescriptions. In order to assess their impact, diagnoses and prescriptions were compared in a population of children attending daycare centres in southeastern France in 2008 and 2012. Trends in the reimbursement of paediatric antibiotic prescriptions by the national health insurance (NHI) for the whole area were also studied. Distribution of diagnoses accounting for antibiotic treatment and type of antibiotic prescribed over the previous 3 months to children below 4 years of age attending daycare centres in the Alpes-Maritimes area in southeastern France were compared between 2008 and 2012 prior to and following the availability of these new recommendations. Trends in reimbursed ambulatory antibiotic prescriptions by general practitioners and paediatricians in the area were studied for this age group from 2008 to 2012 and in 2013. The majority of recorded diagnoses concerned upper respiratory tract infections (URTI). Inappropriate antibiotic prescription persisted for colds and bronchitis in similar proportions during both surveys. Improvement in the choice of antibiotic with fewer prescriptions for third-generation cephalosporins was observed both in daycare centres and according to NHI data; however, this was mainly recorded among paediatricians. The management of paediatric URTI still needs improvement, pointing to the need to investigate and adequately address the reasons for inappropriate antibiotic prescription.

Indexed as

Drug UtilizationPractice Patterns, Physicians'Anti-Bacterial AgentsChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFranceHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePractice Guidelines as TopicPrescriptionsPrimary Health CareAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.