Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27812752›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2017

Outcomes of surveillance versus adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage IA and IB nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumors.

Mahmut Gumus, Ahmet Bilici, Hatice Odabas, Bala Basak Oven Ustaalioglu, Nurten Kandemir, Umut Demirci, Sener Cihan, Ibrahim Vedat Bayoglu, Turkan Ozturk, Esma Turkmen and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Pathological predictors of metastatic disease in testicular non-seminomatous germ cell tumors: which tumor-node-metastasis staging system?Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Mahmut GumusDepartment of Medical Oncology, Medical Faculty, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ahmet BiliciDepartment of Medical Oncology, Medical Faculty, Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey. ahmetknower@yahoo.com.
Hatice OdabasDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Bala Basak Oven UstaaliogluDepartment of Medical Oncology, Haydarpasa Numune Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Nurten KandemirDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ankara Onkoloji Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Umut DemirciDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ataturk Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Sener CihanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Okmeydani Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ibrahim Vedat BayogluDepartment of Medical Oncology, Izmir Ataturk Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
Turkan OzturkDepartment of Medical Oncology, Medical Faculty, Karadeniz University, Trabzon, Turkey.
Esma TurkmenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Medical Faculty, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey.
Zurat UrakciDepartment of Medical Oncology, Medical Faculty, Dicle University, Diyarbakir, Turkey.
Mehmet Metin SekerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Medical Faculty, Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey.
Yusuf GunaydinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Medical Faculty, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
Fatih SelcukbiricikDepartment of Medical Oncology, Medical Faculty, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Nedim TuranDepartment of Medical Oncology, Malatya State Hospital, Malatya, Turkey.
Alper SevincDepartment of Medical Oncology, Medical Faculty, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrently, it is accepted that risk assessment of clinical stage I (CS I) nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT) patient is mainly dependent on the presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI). Initial active surveillance, adjuvant chemotherapy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) are acceptable treatment options for these patients, but there is no uniform consensus. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of active surveillance with adjuvant chemotherapy.

methodsA total of 201 patients with CS I NSGCT after orchiectomy were included. Outcomes of active surveillance and adjuvant chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. The prognostic significance of risk factors for survival and relapse was evaluated.

resultsOf the 201 patients, 110 (54.7%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, while the remaining 91 patients (45.3%) underwent surveillance. Relapses were significantly higher for patients underwent surveillance compared to adjuvant chemotherapy group (18.3 vs. 1.2%, p < 0.001). The 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate for patients who were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly better than those of patients underwent surveillance (97.6 vs. 80.8%, respectively; p < 0.001). Univariate analysis showed that the presence of LVI (p = 0.01) and treatment option (p < 0.001) were prognostic factors for RFS and pT stage (p = 0.004) and invasion of rete testis (p = 0.004) and the presence of relapse (p < 0.001) were significant prognostic factors for OS. Multivariate analysis revealed that the treatment strategy was an independent prognostic factor for RFS (p < 0.001, HR 0.54). A logistic regression analysis demonstrated that treatment options (p = 0.031), embryonal carcinoma (EC) >50% (p = 0.013) and tumor diameter (p = 0.016) were found to be independent factors for predicting relapse.

conclusionsOur results indicate that adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved RFS compared with surveillance for CS I NSGCT patients. Moreover, the treatment strategy is an important prognostic indicator for RFS and a predictive factor for relapse. Although adjuvant chemotherapy seems to be a suitable treatment for patients with risk factors for relapse, surveillance is still preferred management option.

Indexed as

Chemotherapy, AdjuvantNeoplasms, Germ Cell and EmbryonalOrchiectomyTesticular NeoplasmsAdultDisease-Free SurvivalHumansMaleNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSurvival RateChemotherapyNonseminomatous germ cell tumorStage ISurveillanceTesticular cancer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.