ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2017
A Method for the Annotation of Functional Similarities of Coding DNA Sequences: the Case of a Populated Cluster of Transmembrane Proteins.
Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- New Short RNA Motifs Potentially Relevant in the SARS-CoV-2 Genome.Current genomics · 2023Article
- Evolutionary conserved compositional structures hidden in genomes of the foot-and-mouth disease virus and of the human rhinovirus.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Conserved Critical Evolutionary Gene Structures in Orthologs.Journal of molecular evolution · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The analysis of a large number of human and mouse genes codifying for a populated cluster of transmembrane proteins revealed that some of the genes significantly vary in their primary nucleotide sequence inter-species and also intra-species. In spite of that divergence and of the fact that all these genes share a common parental function we asked the question of whether at DNA level they have some kind of common compositional structure, not evident from the analysis of their primary nucleotide sequence. To reveal the existence of gene clusters not based on primary sequence relationships we have analyzed 13574 human and 14047 mouse genes by the composon-clustering methodology. The data presented show that most of the genes from each one of the samples are distributed in 18 clusters sharing the common compositional features between the particular human and mouse clusters. It was observed, in addition, that between particular human and mouse clusters having similar composon-profiles large variations in gene population were detected as an indication that a significant amount of orthologs between both species differs in compositional features. A gene cluster containing exclusively genes codifying for transmembrane proteins, an important fraction of which belongs to the Rhodopsin G-protein coupled receptor superfamily, was also detected. This indicates that even though some of them display low sequence similarity, all of them, in both species, participate with similar compositional features in terms of composons. We conclude that in this family of transmembrane proteins in general and in the Rhodopsin G-protein coupled receptor in particular, the composon-clustering reveals the existence of a type of common compositional structure underlying the primary nucleotide sequence closely correlated to function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.