Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27812746›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2017

Junior doctors' medical specialty and practice location choice: simulating policies to overcome regional inequalities.

Pedro Ramos, Hélio Alves, Paulo Guimarães, Maria A Ferreira

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. How French general practitioners respond to declining medical density: a study on prescription practices, with an insight into opioids use.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pedro RamosMedical Director Office, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil. pedrosaldanharamos@live.com.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6825-6577
Hélio AlvesFaculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Paulo GuimarãesBank of Portugal, Porto, Portugal.
Maria A FerreiraFaculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are nowadays over 1 million Portuguese who lack a primary care physician. By applying a discrete choice experiment to a large representative sample of Portuguese junior doctors (N = 503) in 2014, we provide an indication that this shortage may be addressed with a careful policy design that mixes pecuniary and non-pecuniary incentives for these junior physicians. According to our simulations, a policy that includes such incentives may increase uptake of general practitioners (GPs) in rural areas from 18% to 30%. Marginal wages estimated from our model are realistic and close to market prices: an extra hour of work would require an hourly wage of 16.5€; moving to an inland rural setting would involve an increase in monthly income of 1.150€ (almost doubling residents' current income); a shift to a GP career would imply an 849€ increase in monthly income. Additional opportunities to work outside the National Health Service overcome an income reduction of 433€. Our simulation predicts that an income increase of 350€ would lead to a 3 percentage point increase in choice probability, which implies an income elasticity of 3.37, a higher estimation compared to previous studies.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceMedicineSalaries and Fringe BenefitsChoice BehaviorHumansSocioeconomic FactorsDiscrete choice experimentLocation decisionMedical specialty choicePortugalRural uptake policies

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.