ArticleInternational journal of public health2017
Unobserved heterogeneity and the comparison of coefficients across nested logistic regression models: how to avoid comparing apples and oranges.
Article in International journal of public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Separating the wheat from the chaff: How to measure hospital quality in routine data?Health services research · 2024Article
- Soccer above all? Analysis of academic and vocational education among female soccer players in the German women's Bundesliga and 2nd women's Bundesliga.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2024Article
- Medical rehabilitation of older employees with migrant background in Germany: Does the utilization meet the needs?PloS one · 2022Article
- Utilization of preventive care among migrants and non-migrants in Germany: results from the representative cross-sectional study 'German health interview and examination survey for adults (DEGS1)'.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2021Article
- Perception of aging in the relation between sport activity and self-rated health in middle and older age - A longitudinal analysis.SSM - population health · 2020Article
- Frequent attenders in the German healthcare system: determinants of high utilization of primary care services. Results from the cross-sectional German health interview and examination survey for adults (DEGS).BMC family practice · 2020Article
- Utilisation of rehabilitation services for non-migrant and migrant groups of higher working age in Germany - results of the lidA cohort study.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Discrimination in healthcare as a barrier to care: experiences of socially disadvantaged populations in France from a nationally representative survey.BMC public health · 2020Article
- Subjective employment perspective among older workers with and without migrant background in Germany-Results of the lidA cohort study.Journal of occupational health · 2020Article
- Article
- Disparities in health care outcomes between immigrants and the majority population in Germany: A trend analysis, 2006-2014.PloS one · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
27812725What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.