Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27812703›Full record

Trial reportJAMA ophthalmology2016

Effect of a Binocular iPad Game vs Part-time Patching in Children Aged 5 to 12 Years With Amblyopia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Jonathan M Holmes, Vivian M Manh, Elizabeth L Lazar, Roy W Beck, Eileen E Birch, Raymond T Kraker, Eric R Crouch, S Ayse Erzurum, Nausheen Khuddus, Allison I Summers and 2 more

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA ophthalmology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 101 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02200211 nacompletednot on this map

Study of Binocular Computer Activities for Treatment of Amblyopia

TypeinterventionalSponsorJaeb Center for Health ResearchRan2014 to 2016Enrolled485ConditionsAmblyopiaArmsiPad®, Patching 2 hours per day, 7 days per week
NCT05620173 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

'Validation and Development of New Dichoptic VR-gaming Method to Treat Childhood Amblyopia; Vedea Amblyopia Therapy (VAT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorVedea Healthware BVRan2023 to 2024Enrolled74ConditionsAmblyopia, Anisometropic, Amblyopia Strabismic, AmblyopiaArmsVedea Amblyopia Therapy (VAT), Occlusion therapy
NCT06150391 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Controlled Trial of a Dichoptic Gabor Videogame Program to Improve Visual Function in Children With Amblyopia

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital de MeridaRan2023 to 2024Enrolled120ConditionsAmblyopiaArmsVisionary: computer exercises using dichoptic Gabor Patches and band-filtered noise masks, Patching
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 201 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Occlusion for stimulus deprivation amblyopia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Randomised trial of three treatments for amblyopia: Vision therapy and patching, perceptual learning and patching alone.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Trial
  14. Patch-free streaming contrast-rebalanced dichoptic cartoons versus patching for treatment of amblyopia in children aged 3 to 5 years: a pilot, randomized clinical trial.Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus · 2024
    Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Barriers to successful dichoptic treatment for amblyopia in young children.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2021
    Trial
  18. Trial
  19. A pilot randomized trial of contrast-rebalanced binocular treatment for deprivation amblyopia.Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus · 2020
    Trial
  20. Convergence Insufficiency Neuro-mechanism in Adult Population Study Randomized Clinical Trial: Clinical Outcome Results.Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry · 2020
    Trial

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan M HolmesDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Vivian M ManhDivision of Ophthalmology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington.
Elizabeth L LazarJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida.
Roy W BeckJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida4Deputy editor, JAMA Ophthalmology.
Eileen E BirchRetina Foundation of the Southwest, Dallas, Texas.
Raymond T KrakerJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida.
Eric R CrouchDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk.
S Ayse ErzurumDepartment of Surgery, North East Ohio Medical University, Rootstown.
Nausheen KhuddusAccent Physicians, Gainesville, Florida.
Allison I SummersDepartment of Ophthalmology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.
David K WallaceDepartment of Ophthalmology, Duke Eye Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group
Jaeb Center for Health Research · USEastern Virginia Medical School · USMayo Clinic · USNortheast Ohio Medical University · USOregon Health & Science University · USRetina Foundation of the Southwest · USSeattle Children's Hospital · US

Funding

Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group Coordinating CenterU10EY011751 · NEI · JAEB CENTER FOR HEALTH RESEARCH, INC. · PI KRAKER, RAYMOND · 1997 to 2018
$75.2M
Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group NetworkUG1EY011751 · NEI · JAEB CENTER FOR HEALTH RESEARCH, INC. · PI Raymond Kraker, Stacy Pineles · 2019 to 2026
$53.7M
Proteomics CoreP30EY010572 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI TED S ACOTT · 1995 to 2026
$19.4M
Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group: Chair's OfficeU10EY018810 · NEI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI HOLMES, JONATHAN M · 2009 to 2013
$3.5M
PEDIATRIC EYE DISEASE INVESTIGATOR GROUP: CHAIR'S OFFICEU10EY023198 · NEI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI WALLACE, DAVID K · 2014 to 2018
$1.4M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY010572NEI NIH HHS U10 EY011751NEI NIH HHS U10 EY018810NEI NIH HHS U10 EY023198NEI NIH HHS UG1 EY011751
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceA binocular approach to treating anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia has recently been advocated. Initial studies have yielded promising results, suggesting that a larger randomized clinical trial is warranted.

objectiveTo compare visual acuity (VA) improvement in children with amblyopia treated with a binocular iPad game vs part-time patching. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsA multicenter, noninferiority randomized clinical trial was conducted in community and institutional practices from September 16, 2014, to August 28, 2015. Participants included 385 children aged 5 years to younger than 13 years with amblyopia (20/40 to 20/200, mean 20/63) resulting from strabismus, anisometropia, or both. Participants were randomly assigned to either 16 weeks of a binocular iPad game prescribed for 1 hour a day (190 participants; binocular group) or patching of the fellow eye prescribed for 2 hours a day (195 participants; patching group). Study follow-up visits were scheduled at 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks. A modified intent-to-treat analysis was performed on participants who completed the 16-week trial.

interventionsBinocular iPad game or patching of the fellow eye. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Change in amblyopic-eye VA from baseline to 16 weeks.

resultsOf the 385 participants, 187 were female (48.6%); mean (SD) age was 8.5 (1.9) years. At 16 weeks, mean amblyopic-eye VA improved 1.05 lines (2-sided 95% CI, 0.85-1.24 lines) in the binocular group and 1.35 lines (2-sided 95% CI, 1.17-1.54 lines) in the patching group, with an adjusted treatment group difference of 0.31 lines favoring patching (upper limit of the 1-sided 95% CI, 0.53 lines). This upper limit exceeded the prespecified noninferiority limit of 0.5 lines. Only 39 of the 176 participants (22.2%) randomized to the binocular game and with log file data available performed more than 75% of the prescribed treatment (median, 46%; interquartile range, 20%-72%). In younger participants (aged 5 to <7 years) without prior amblyopia treatment, amblyopic-eye VA improved by a mean (SD) of 2.5 (1.5) lines in the binocular group and 2.8 (0.8) lines in the patching group. Adverse effects (including diplopia) were uncommon and of similar frequency between groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In children aged 5 to younger than 13 years, amblyopic-eye VA improved with binocular game play and with patching, particularly in younger children (age 5 to <7 years) without prior amblyopia treatment. Although the primary noninferiority analysis was indeterminate, a post hoc analysis suggested that VA improvement with this particular binocular iPad treatment was not as good as with 2 hours of prescribed daily patching.

trial registrationhttp://www.clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02200211.

Indexed as

BandagesComputers, HandheldVideo GamesAmblyopiaChildChild, PreschoolEyeglassesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleSensory DeprivationVision, BinocularVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID27812703
PMCPMC5145771
OpenAlexW2548543256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.