Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27812621›Full record

Trial reportJournal of applied oral science : revista FOB

The effect of various kinematics on postoperative pain after instrumentation: a prospective, randomized clinical study.

Hakan Arslan, Ruslan Khalilov, Ezgi Doğanay, Ertugrul Karatas

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Present status and future directions: Canal shaping.International endodontic journal · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hakan ArslanAtaturk University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics, Erzurum, Turkey.
Ruslan KhalilovAtaturk University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics, Erzurum, Turkey.
Ezgi DoğanayAtaturk University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics, Erzurum, Turkey.
Ertugrul KaratasAtaturk University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics, Erzurum, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objective: To evaluate various kinematic movements on postoperative pain using a Reciproc system. MATERIAL AND

methods: Fifty-six molar teeth were divided into four groups according to kinematics as follows: continuous rotation, 360° CCW - 30° CW, 270° CCW - 30° CW, and 150° CCW - 30° CW. Preoperative and postoperative pain levels using visual analogue scale (VAS), percussion pain, and analgesic intake were recorded for each subject. Postoperative pain levels at 1, 3, 5, and 7 d were evaluated. Data were analyzed statistically using the Kruskal-Walis, Mann-Whitney-U, one-way analysis of variance, and chi-square tests (p=0.05).

results: Continuous rotation resulted in more pain at Day 1 when compared with the reciprocating groups (360° CCW - 30° CW and 270° CCW - 30° C) (p<0.05).

conclusions: Continuous rotation resulted in more postoperative pain at Day 1 than in reciprocating groups, and thereafter no significant pain was found among the groups.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnalysis of VarianceDental InstrumentsEquipment DesignFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPostoperative PainPreoperative PeriodProspective StudiesRoot Canal TherapyRotationStatistics, Nonparametric

Identifiers

PMID27812621
PMCPMC5083028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.