ArticleCanadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology2016
Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation for Removal of Large Bile Duct Stones in Advanced Age.
Article in Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06948279 (Immediate Versus Elective Endoscopic Removal of Large Common Bile Duct Stones in High-Risk Elderly Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Immediate Versus Elective Endoscopic Removal of Large Common Bile Duct Stones in High-Risk Elderly Patients
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of immediate vs. delayed endoscopic retrieval of large or multiple common bile duct stones in high-risk elderly patients: a prospective, randomized comparative study.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Trial
- Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilatation With or Without Endoscopic Sphincterotomy in the Treatment of Common Bile Duct Stones.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025Review
- Large common bile duct stones in high-risk elderly patients: Immediate endoscopic stone removal or elective stone removal? A single-center retrospective study.BMC gastroenterology · 2023Article
- ERCP for bile duct stones across a national service, demonstrating a high requirement for repeat procedures.Endoscopy international open · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.