Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27812502›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2016

Comparison of unsupervised classification methods for brain tumor segmentation using multi-parametric MRI.

N Sauwen, M Acou, S Van Cauter, D M Sima, J Veraart, F Maes, U Himmelreich, E Achten, S Van Huffel

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

N SauwenKU Leuven, Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT), STADIUS Centre for Dynamical Systems, Signal Processing and Data Analytics, Leuven, Belgium; iMinds, Department of Medical Information Technologies, Belgium.
M AcouGhent University Hospital, Department of Radiology, Ghent, Belgium.
S Van CauterUniversity Hospitals of Leuven, Department of Radiology, Leuven, Belgium; Ziekenhuizen Oost-Limburg, Department of Radiology, Leuven, Belgium.
D M SimaKU Leuven, Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT), STADIUS Centre for Dynamical Systems, Signal Processing and Data Analytics, Leuven, Belgium; iMinds, Department of Medical Information Technologies, Belgium.
J VeraartUniversity of Antwerp, iMinds Vision Lab, Department of Physics, Antwerp, Belgium.
F MaesKU Leuven, Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT), PSI Centre for Processing Speech and Images, Leuven, Belgium.
U HimmelreichKU Leuven, Biomedical MRI/MoSAIC, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Leuven, Belgium.
E AchtenGhent University Hospital, Department of Radiology, Ghent, Belgium.
S Van HuffelKU Leuven, Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT), STADIUS Centre for Dynamical Systems, Signal Processing and Data Analytics, Leuven, Belgium; iMinds, Department of Medical Information Technologies, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor segmentation is a particularly challenging task in high-grade gliomas (HGGs), as they are among the most heterogeneous tumors in oncology. An accurate delineation of the lesion and its main subcomponents contributes to optimal treatment planning, prognosis and follow-up. Conventional MRI (cMRI) is the imaging modality of choice for manual segmentation, and is also considered in the vast majority of automated segmentation studies. Advanced MRI modalities such as perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) have already shown their added value in tumor tissue characterization, hence there have been recent suggestions of combining different MRI modalities into a multi-parametric MRI (MP-MRI) approach for brain tumor segmentation. In this paper, we compare the performance of several unsupervised classification methods for HGG segmentation based on MP-MRI data including cMRI, DWI, MRSI and PWI. Two independent MP-MRI datasets with a different acquisition protocol were available from different hospitals. We demonstrate that a hierarchical non-negative matrix factorization variant which was previously introduced for MP-MRI tumor segmentation gives the best performance in terms of mean Dice-scores for the pathologic tissue classes on both datasets.

Indexed as

Data Interpretation, StatisticalBrain NeoplasmsDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingGliomaHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy1H MRSI, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imagingADC, apparent diffusion coefficientCho, total cholineClusteringcMRI, conventional magnetic resonance imagingCre, total creatineDKI, diffusion kurtosis imagingDSC-MRI, dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imagingDTI, diffusion tensor imagingDWI, diffusion-weighted imagingFA, fractional anisotropyFCM, fuzzy C-means clusteringFLAIR, fluid-attenuated inversion recoveryGBM, glioblastoma multiformeGliomaGlx, glutamine + glutamateGly, glycineGMM, Gaussian mixture modellingHALS, hierarchical alternating least squaresHGG, high-grade gliomahNMF, hierarchical non-negative matrix factorizationLac, lactateLGG, low-grade gliomaLip, lipidsMD, mean diffusivitymI, myo-inositolMK, mean kurtosisMP-MRI, multi-parametric magnetic resonance imagingMulti-parametric MRINAA, N-acetyl-aspartateNMF, non-negative matrix factorizationNNLS, non-negative linear least-squaresNon-negative matrix factorizationPWI, perfusion-weighted imagingrCBV, relative cerebral blood volumeROI, region of interestSC, spectral clusteringSegmentationSPA, successive projection algorithmT1c, contrast-enhanced T1Unsupervised classificationUZ Gent, University hospital of GhentUZ Leuven, University hospitals of Leuven

Identifiers

PMID27812502
PMCPMC5079350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.