Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27812402›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2016

Comparative genomics of

Christopher R Clarke, Byron W Hayes, Brendan J Runde, Eric Markel, Bryan M Swingle, Boris A Vinatzer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The RsmA RNA-Binding Proteins inFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher R ClarkePlant Pathology, Physiology and Weed Science, Virginia Tech , Blacksburg , VA , USA.
Byron W HayesPlant Pathology, Physiology and Weed Science, Virginia Tech , Blacksburg , VA , USA.
Brendan J RundePlant Pathology, Physiology and Weed Science, Virginia Tech , Blacksburg , VA , USA.
Eric MarkelEmerging Pests and Pathogens Research Unit, Robert W. Holley Center for Agriculture and Health, United States Department of Agriculture , Ithaca , NY , USA.
Bryan M SwingleEmerging Pests and Pathogens Research Unit, Robert W. Holley Center for Agriculture and Health, United States Department of Agriculture, Ithaca, NY, USA; Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Boris A VinatzerPlant Pathology, Physiology and Weed Science, Virginia Tech , Blacksburg , VA , USA.
Virginia Tech · USPlant (United States) · USRobert W. Holley Center for Agriculture & Health · US

Funding

VT Initiative for Maximizing Student DiversityR25GM072767 · NIGMS · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI SMITH, EDWARD J · 2007 to 2021
$6.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM072767
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The majority of bacterial foliar plant pathogens must invade the apoplast of host plants through points of ingress, such as stomata or wounds, to replicate to high population density and cause disease. How pathogens navigate plant surfaces to locate invasion sites remains poorly understood. Many bacteria use chemical-directed regulation of flagellar rotation, a process known as chemotaxis, to move towards favorable environmental conditions. Chemotactic sensing of the plant surface is a potential mechanism through which foliar plant pathogens home in on wounds or stomata, but chemotactic systems in foliar plant pathogens are not well characterized. Comparative genomics of the plant pathogen

Indexed as

CheAChemotaxisDC3000FlagellinPtoSwarming motilitySwimming motilityTwitching motility

Identifiers

PMID27812402
PMCPMC5088630
OpenAlexW2530905829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.