Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27812325›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in integrative neuroscience2016

Benefits from Vergence Rehabilitation: Evidence for Improvement of Reading Saccades and Fixations.

François Daniel, Aurélien Morize, Dominique Brémond-Gignac, Zoï Kapoula

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in integrative neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Objective Assessment of Disparity Vergence after Treatment of Symptomatic Convergence Insufficiency in Children.Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

François DanielIRIS Group, Physiopathologie de la Vision et Motricité Binoculaire Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique FR3636 Université Paris Descartes Paris, France.
Aurélien MorizeIRIS Group, Physiopathologie de la Vision et Motricité Binoculaire Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique FR3636 Université Paris Descartes Paris, France.
Dominique Brémond-GignacIRIS Group, Physiopathologie de la Vision et Motricité Binoculaire Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique FR3636 Université Paris DescartesParis, France; Ophthalmology Service, Hôpital Necker - Enfants MaladesParis, France.
Zoï KapoulaIRIS Group, Physiopathologie de la Vision et Motricité Binoculaire Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique FR3636 Université Paris Descartes Paris, France.
Université Paris Cité · FRLaboratoire Psychologie de la Perception · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We hypothesize that binocular coordination of saccades is based on continuous neuroplasticity involving interactions of saccades and vergence. To test this hypothesis we study reading saccades in young students who were diagnosed for vergence disorders before and after vergence rehabilitation. Following orthoptic evaluation and symptomatology screening, 5 weekly sessions of vergence rehabilitation were applied with the REMOBI vergence double step protocole (see Kapoula et al., 2016). Using the Eyeseecam videoculography device we measured vergence as well as saccades and fixations during a reading test four times: at the beginning and at the end of the first and of the fifth vergence rehabilitation session. The results show elimination of symptoms, improvement of clinical orthoptic scores, and importantly increase of measured vergence gain and reduction of inter-trial variability. Improvement of the vergence was associated to a decrease of the disconjugacy of saccades during reading but also to shortening of fixation durations, to reduction of the number of regressive saccades and to a better correction of the intra-saccadic disconjugacy during the following fixation. The results corroborate the hypothesis of neuroplasticity based on saccade vergence interaction in young adults. It validates the clinical validity of the vergence double-step REMOBI method as a means to improve both, vergence and reading performances. It opens a new research approach on the link between fine binocular coordination of saccades, quality of the vergence response, attention, cognition and reading.

Indexed as

cognitionfixationreading saccadesrehabilitationvergence eye movements

Identifiers

PMID27812325
PMCPMC5071378
OpenAlexW2533056533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.