Comparative Genomics of Amphibian-like Ranaviruses, Nucleocytoplasmic Large DNA Viruses of Poikilotherms.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Continent-Wide Distribution of CMTV-Like Ranavirus, from the Urals to the Atlantic Ocean.EcoHealth · 2025
   Article
2. Climate warming triggers the emergence of native viruses in Iberian amphibians.iScience · 2022
   Article
3. Frog Virus 3 Genomes Reveal Prevalent Recombination between Ranavirus Lineages and Their Origins in Canada.Journal of virology · 2019
   Article
4. Ranavirus genotypes in the Netherlands and their potential association with virulence in water frogs (Pelophylax spp.).Emerging microbes & infections · 2018
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as