Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27812172›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Adult Hematology and Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Reference Ranges in a Zimbabwean Population.

Wadzanai P Samaneka, Gibson Mandozana, Willard Tinago, Nehemiah Nhando, Nyaradzo M Mgodi, Mutsawashe F Bwakura-Dangarembizi, Marshall W Munjoma, Zvenyika A R Gomo, Zvavahera M Chirenje, James G Hakim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Wadzanai P SamanekaUniversity of Zimbabwe-University of California San Francisco Collaborative Research Programme, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0215-9309
Gibson MandozanaDepartment of Community Medicine, University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Willard TinagoDepartment of Community Medicine, University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Nehemiah NhandoUniversity of Zimbabwe-University of California San Francisco Collaborative Research Programme, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Nyaradzo M MgodiUniversity of Zimbabwe-University of California San Francisco Collaborative Research Programme, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Mutsawashe F Bwakura-DangarembiziDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Marshall W MunjomaUniversity of Zimbabwe-University of California San Francisco Collaborative Research Programme, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Zvenyika A R GomoDepartment of Chemical Pathology, University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Zvavahera M ChirenjeUniversity of Zimbabwe-University of California San Francisco Collaborative Research Programme, Harare, Zimbabwe.
James G HakimUniversity of Zimbabwe-University of California San Francisco Collaborative Research Programme, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaboratory reference ranges used for clinical care and clinical trials in various laboratories in Zimbabwe were derived from textbooks and research studies conducted more than ten years ago. Periodic verification of these ranges is essential to track changes over time. The purpose of this study was to establish hematology and chemistry laboratory reference ranges using more rigorous methods.

methodsA community-based cross-sectional study was carried out in Harare, Chitungwiza, and Mutoko. A multistage sampling technique was used. Samples were transported from the field for analysis at the ISO15189 certified University of Zimbabwe-University of California San Francisco Central Research Laboratory. Hematology and clinical chemistry reference ranges lower and upper reference limits were estimated at the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles respectively.

resultsA total of 769 adults (54% males) aged 18 to 55 years were included in the analysis. Median age was 28 [IQR: 23-35] years. Males had significantly higher red cell counts, hemoglobin, hematocrit, and mean corpuscular hemoglobin compared to females. Females had higher white cell counts, platelets, absolute neutrophil counts, and absolute lymphocyte counts compared to males. There were no gender differences in eosinophils, monocytes, and absolute basophil count. Males had significantly higher levels of urea, sodium, potassium, calcium, creatinine, amylase, total protein, albumin and liver enzymes levels compared to females. Females had higher cholesterol and lipase compared with males. There are notable differences in the white cell counts, neutrophils, cholesterol, and creatinine kinase when compared with the currently used reference ranges.

conclusionData from this study provides new country specific reference ranges which should be immediately adopted for routine clinical care and accurate monitoring of adverse events in research studies.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolClinical Chemistry TestsFemaleHematologyHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedReference ValuesYoung AdultZimbabwe

Identifiers

PMID27812172
PMCPMC5094654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.