Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27812153›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

A 90-Day Feeding Study in Rats to Assess the Safety of Genetically Engineered Pork.

Gao-Jun Xiao, Sheng-Wang Jiang, Li-Li Qian, Chun-Bo Cai, Qing-Qing Wang, De-Zun Ma, Biao Li, Shan-Shan Xie, Wen-Tao Cui, Kui Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A 90-Day Safety Study of Meat fromLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gao-Jun XiaoInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, P. R. China.
Sheng-Wang JiangInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, P. R. China.
Li-Li QianState Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, P. R. China.
Chun-Bo CaiInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, P. R. China.
Qing-Qing WangInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, P. R. China.
De-Zun MaInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, P. R. China.
Biao LiInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, P. R. China.
Shan-Shan XieInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, P. R. China.
Wen-Tao CuiInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, P. R. China.
Kui LiInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, P. R. China.
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNInstitute of Animal Sciences · CNChina Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our laboratory recently produced genetically engineered (GE) Meishan pigs containing a ZFN-edited myostatin loss-of-function mutant. These GE pigs develop and grow as normal as wild type pigs but produce pork with greater lean yield and lower fat mass. To assess any potential subchronic toxicity risks of this GE pork, a 90-day feeding study was conducted in Sprague-Dawley rats. Rats were randomly divided into five groups, and fed for 90 days with basic diet and basic diets formulated with low dose and high dose pork prepared from wild type pigs and GE pigs, respectively. Animal behaviors and clinical signs were monitored twice daily, and body weight and food consumption were measured and recorded weekly. At days 45 and 90, blood tests (lipid panel, electrolytes, parameters related to liver and kidney functions, and complete blood counts) were performed. Additionally, gross pathology and histopathological analyses were performed for major organs in each group. Data analysis shows that there were no significant differences in growth rate, food consumption, and blood test parameters between rat groups fed with GE pork and wild type pork. Although differences in some liver function parameters (such as aspartate aminotransferase, total proteins, albumin, and alkaline phosphatase) and white blood cell counts (such as lymphocyte percentage and monocyte percentage) were observed between rats fed with high dose GE pork and basic diet, all test results in rats fed with GE pork are in the normal range. Additionally, there are no apparent lesions noted in all organs isolated from rats in all five feeding groups on days 45 and 90. Overall, our results clearly indicate that food consumption of GE pork produced by ZFN-edited myostatin loss-of-function mutant pigs did not have any long-term adverse effects on the health status in rats.

Indexed as

Animal FeedFood SafetySwineAnimalsBody WeightEatingFemaleFood, Genetically ModifiedHematologyLipidsLiver Function TestsMaleMutationMyostatinOrgan SizeRatsLipidsMyostatin

Identifiers

PMID27812153
PMCPMC5094721
OpenAlexW2548613223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.