Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27812129›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Patterns of Individual Variation in Visual Pathway Structure and Function in the Sighted and Blind.

Geoffrey K Aguirre, Ritobrato Datta, Noah C Benson, Sashank Prasad, Samuel G Jacobson, Artur V Cideciyan, Holly Bridge, Kate E Watkins, Omar H Butt, Aleksandra S Dain and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Role of Visual Experience in Individual Differences of Brain Connectivity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Geoffrey K AguirreDepartment of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4028-3100
Ritobrato DattaDepartment of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.
Noah C BensonDepartment of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.
Sashank PrasadDepartment of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.
Samuel G JacobsonDepartment of Ophthalmology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.
Artur V CideciyanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.
Holly BridgeFMRIB Centre, Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom.
Kate E WatkinsDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3UD, United Kingdom.
Omar H ButtDepartment of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.
Aleksandra S DainDepartment of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.
Lauren BrandesDepartment of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.
Efstathios D GennatasDepartment of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.
University of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Scientific TransparencyP30EY001583 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CLAIRE H MITCHELL · 1985 to 2026
$19.5M
statistics coreP30NS045839 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DETRE, JOHN A · 2003 to 2017
$10.1M
Cortical Structure and Function in Blindness and following Restored VisionR01EY020516 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI AGUIRRE, GEOFFREY KARL · 2011 to 2015
$2.0M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001583NEI NIH HHS R01 EY020516NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS045839
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many structural and functional brain alterations accompany blindness, with substantial individual variation in these effects. In normally sighted people, there is correlated individual variation in some visual pathway structures. Here we examined if the changes in brain anatomy produced by blindness alter the patterns of anatomical variation found in the sighted. We derived eight measures of central visual pathway anatomy from a structural image of the brain from 59 sighted and 53 blind people. These measures showed highly significant differences in mean size between the sighted and blind cohorts. When we examined the measurements across individuals within each group we found three clusters of correlated variation, with V1 surface area and pericalcarine volume linked, and independent of the thickness of V1 cortex. These two clusters were in turn relatively independent of the volumes of the optic chiasm and lateral geniculate nucleus. This same pattern of variation in visual pathway anatomy was found in the sighted and the blind. Anatomical changes within these clusters were graded by the timing of onset of blindness, with those subjects with a post-natal onset of blindness having alterations in brain anatomy that were intermediate to those seen in the sighted and congenitally blind. Many of the blind and sighted subjects also contributed functional MRI measures of cross-modal responses within visual cortex, and a diffusion tensor imaging measure of fractional anisotropy within the optic radiations and the splenium of the corpus callosum. We again found group differences between the blind and sighted in these measures. The previously identified clusters of anatomical variation were also found to be differentially related to these additional measures: across subjects, V1 cortical thickness was related to cross-modal activation, and the volume of the optic chiasm and lateral geniculate was related to fractional anisotropy in the visual pathway. Our findings show that several of the structural and functional effects of blindness may be reduced to a smaller set of dimensions. It also seems that the changes in the brain that accompany blindness are on a continuum with normal variation found in the sighted.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnisotropyBlindnessFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedVisual PathwaysWhite MatterYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27812129
PMCPMC5094697
OpenAlexW2951150319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.