Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27812027›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

In Vivo Bioluminescence Tomography for Monitoring Breast Tumor Growth and Metastatic Spreading: Comparative Study and Mathematical Modeling.

Séverine Mollard, Raphaelle Fanciullino, Sarah Giacometti, Cindy Serdjebi, Sebastien Benzekry, Joseph Ciccolini

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review of quantitative multiscale imaging of breast cancer.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2018
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Séverine MollardPharmacokinectics Laboratory, SMARTc Unit, Inserm S_911 CrO2, Aix-Marseille Univ, Marseille, France.
Raphaelle FanciullinoPharmacokinectics Laboratory, SMARTc Unit, Inserm S_911 CrO2, Aix-Marseille Univ, Marseille, France.
Sarah GiacomettiPharmacokinectics Laboratory, SMARTc Unit, Inserm S_911 CrO2, Aix-Marseille Univ, Marseille, France.
Cindy SerdjebiPharmacokinectics Laboratory, SMARTc Unit, Inserm S_911 CrO2, Aix-Marseille Univ, Marseille, France.
Sebastien BenzekryMONC Team INRIA, Bordeaux France.
Joseph CiccoliniPharmacokinectics Laboratory, SMARTc Unit, Inserm S_911 CrO2, Aix-Marseille Univ, Marseille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed at evaluating the reliability and precision of Diffuse Luminescent Imaging Tomography (DLIT) for monitoring primary tumor and metastatic spreading in breast cancer mice, and to develop a biomathematical model to describe the collected data. Using orthotopic mammary fat pad model of breast cancer (MDAMB231-Luc) in mice, we monitored tumor and metastatic spreading by three-dimensional (3D) bioluminescence and cross-validated it with standard bioluminescence imaging, caliper measurement and necropsy examination. DLIT imaging proved to be reproducible and reliable throughout time. It was possible to discriminate secondary lesions from the main breast cancer, without removing the primary tumor. Preferential metastatic sites were lungs, peritoneum and lymph nodes. Necropsy examinations confirmed DLIT measurements. Marked differences in growth profiles were observed, with an overestimation of the exponential phase when using a caliper as compared with bioluminescence. Our mathematical model taking into account the balance between living and necrotic cells proved to be able to reproduce the experimental data obtained with a caliper or DLIT imaging, because it could discriminate proliferative living cells from a more composite mass consisting of tumor cells, necrotic cell, or inflammatory tissues. DLIT imaging combined with mathematical modeling could be a powerful and informative tool in experimental oncology.

Indexed as

AnimalsBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorFemaleHeterograftsHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalLuminescent MeasurementsMammary Neoplasms, ExperimentalMiceModels, BiologicalReproducibility of ResultsTomography, Optical

Identifiers

PMID27812027
PMCPMC5095884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.