Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27811313›Full record

ArticleGut2018

Endoscopic resection of high-risk T1 colorectal carcinoma prior to surgical resection has no adverse effect on long-term outcomes.

A Overwater, K Kessels, S G Elias, Y Backes, B W M Spanier, T C J Seerden, H J M Pullens, W H de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel, A van den Blink, G J A Offerhaus and 11 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gut, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04150081 (Endoscopic Versus Surgical Treatment for T1 Colorectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 54 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04150081 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Endoscopic Versus Surgical Treatment for T1 Colorectal Cancer: a Population-based Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorHospital Clinic of BarcelonaRan2019 to 2022Enrolled1,400ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsSurgery or Endoscopic treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Competing Mortality Redefines the Net Benefit of Additional Surgery After Endoscopic Resection for T1 Colorectal Cancer in Older Adults.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

A OverwaterDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
K KesselsDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
S G EliasJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Y BackesDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
B W M SpanierDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Rijnstate, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
T C J SeerdenDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
H J M PullensDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
W H de Vos Tot Nederveen CappelDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
A van den BlinkDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
G J A OfferhausDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J van BergeijkDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands.
M KerkhofDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Groene Hart Hospital, Gouda, The Netherlands.
J M J GeesingDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J N GroenDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, St. Jansdal Harderwijk, Harderwijk, The Netherlands.
N van LelyveldDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
F Ter BorgDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands.
F WolfhagenDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
P D SiersemaDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
M M LacleDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
L M G MoonsDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Dutch T1 CRC Working Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIt is difficult to predict the presence of histological risk factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) before endoscopic treatment of T1 colorectal cancer (CRC). Therefore, endoscopic therapy is propagated to obtain adequate histological staging. We examined whether secondary surgery following endoscopic resection of high-risk T1 CRC does not have a negative effect on patients' outcomes compared with primary surgery.

designPatients with T1 CRC with one or more histological risk factors for LNM (high risk) and treated with primary or secondary surgery between 2000 and 2014 in 13 hospitals were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Additional data were collected from hospital records, endoscopy, radiology and pathology reports. A propensity score analysis was performed using inverse probability weighting (IPW) to correct for confounding by indication.

results602 patients were eligible for analysis (263 primary; 339 secondary surgery). Overall, 34 recurrences were observed (5.6%). After adjusting with IPW, no differences were observed between primary and secondary surgery for the presence of LNM (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.49 to 1.93; p=0.940) and recurrence during follow-up (HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.41 to 2.34; p=0.954). Further adjusting for lymphovascular invasion, depth of invasion and number of retrieved lymph nodes did not alter this outcome.

conclusionsOur data do not support an increased risk of LNM or recurrence after secondary surgery compared with primary surgery. Therefore, an attempt for an en-bloc resection of a possible T1 CRC without evident signs of deep invasion seems justified in order to prevent surgery of low-risk T1 CRC in a significant proportion of patients.

Indexed as

Lymph Node ExcisionNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalReoperationAdenocarcinomaAgedColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingPostoperative ComplicationsRisk FactorsCOLONIC POLYPSCOLONOSCOPYCOLORECTAL CARCINOMACOLORECTAL SURGERYTHERAPEUTIC ENDOSCOPY

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.