Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27811290›Full record

ArticleQualitative health research2017

Participatory Ethnographic Evaluation and Research: Reflections on the Research Approach Used to Understand the Complexity of Maternal Health Issues in South Sudan.

Khalifa Elmusharaf, Elaine Byrne, Mary Manandhar, Joanne Hemmings, Diarmuid O'Donovan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Qualitative health research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Khalifa Elmusharaf1 Graduate Entry Medical School (GEMS), University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Elaine Byrne3 Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Mary Manandhar4 Renewing Efforts Against Child Hunger (REACH), United Nations, Yangon, Myanmar.
Joanne Hemmings5 Options, London, United Kingdom.
Diarmuid O'Donovan6 National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many methodological approaches have been used to understand cultural dimensions to maternal health issues. Although a well-designed quantitative survey with a representative sample can provide essential information on trends in behavior, it does not necessarily establish a contextualized understanding of the complexity in which different behaviors occur. This article addresses how contextualized data can be collected in a short time and under conditions in which participants in conflict-affected zones might not have established, or time to establish, trust with the researchers. The solution, the Participatory Ethnographic Evaluation and Research (PEER) approach, is illustrated through a study whereby South Sudanese marginalized women were trained to design research instruments, and collect and analyze qualitative data. PEER overcomes the problem that many ethnographic or participatory approaches face-the extensive time and resources required to develop trusting relationships with the community to understand the local context and the social networks they form.

Indexed as

Research DesignAdolescentAdultAnthropology, CulturalArmed ConflictsCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaternal HealthMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSocioeconomic FactorsSouth SudanYoung Adultconflict-affected fragile statesethnographicmaternal healthparticipatoryParticipatory Ethnographic Evaluation and ResearchPEERqualitativeSouth Sudan

Identifiers

PMID27811290
PMCPMC5476190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.