Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27811121›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine2017

Automatic Valve Plane Localization in Myocardial Perfusion SPECT/CT by Machine Learning: Anatomic and Clinical Validation.

Julian Betancur, Mathieu Rubeaux, Tobias A Fuchs, Yuka Otaki, Yoav Arnson, Leandro Slipczuk, Dominik C Benz, Guido Germano, Damini Dey, Chih-Jen Lin and 3 more

Abstract readEvaluation StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. 2022 Artificial intelligence primer for the nuclear cardiologist.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. A method using deep learning to discover new predictors from left-ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony for CRT response.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Artificial intelligence in nuclear cardiology: Preparing for the fifth industrial revolution.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Quantitative clinical nuclear cardiology, part 2: Evolving/emerging applications.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Julian BetancurDepartment of Imaging, Medicine, and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Mathieu RubeauxDepartment of Imaging, Medicine, and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Tobias A FuchsCardiac Imaging, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; and.
Yuka OtakiDepartment of Imaging, Medicine, and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Yoav ArnsonDepartment of Imaging, Medicine, and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Leandro SlipczukDepartment of Imaging, Medicine, and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Dominik C BenzCardiac Imaging, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; and.
Guido GermanoDepartment of Imaging, Medicine, and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Damini DeyDepartment of Imaging, Medicine, and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Chih-Jen LinDepartment of Computer Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Daniel S BermanDepartment of Imaging, Medicine, and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Philipp A KaufmannCardiac Imaging, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; and.
Piotr J SlomkaDepartment of Imaging, Medicine, and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California Piotr.Slomka@cshs.org.

Funding

Quantitative Prediction of Disease and Outcomes from Next Generation SPECT and CTR01HL089765 · NHLBI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI SLOMKA, PIOTR J · 2007 to 2021
$6.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL089765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precise definition of the mitral valve plane (VP) during segmentation of the left ventricle for SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) quantification often requires manual adjustment, which affects the quantification of perfusion. We developed a machine learning approach using support vector machines (SVM) for automatic VP placement.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAnatomic LandmarksHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMiddle AgedMitral ValveMyocardial Perfusion ImagingPattern Recognition, AutomatedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySingle Photon Emission Computed Tomography Computed Tomographycoronary CT angiographymachine learningmyocardial perfusion imagingSPECT quantificationsupport vector classification

Identifiers

PMID27811121
PMCPMC5450369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.