Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27811059›Full record

ArticleFASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology2017

Cell proliferation within small intestinal crypts is the principal driving force for cell migration on villi.

Aimee Parker, Oliver J Maclaren, Alexander G Fletcher, Daniele Muraro, Peter A Kreuzaler, Helen M Byrne, Philip K Maini, Alastair J M Watson, Carmen Pin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Intestinal Effects of Brewers' Spent Grain Extract In Ovo (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aimee ParkerGut Health and Food Safety Research Programme, Institute of Food Research, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Oliver J MaclarenWolfson Centre for Mathematical Biology, Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Alexander G FletcherWolfson Centre for Mathematical Biology, Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Daniele MuraroWolfson Centre for Mathematical Biology, Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Peter A KreuzalerDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom; and.
Helen M ByrneWolfson Centre for Mathematical Biology, Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Philip K MainiWolfson Centre for Mathematical Biology, Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Alastair J M WatsonNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Carmen PinGut Health and Food Safety Research Programme, Institute of Food Research, Norwich, United Kingdom; carmen.pin@ifr.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J004529/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K017144/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K017578/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K018256/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The functional integrity of the intestinal epithelial barrier relies on tight coordination of cell proliferation and migration, with failure to regulate these processes resulting in disease. It is not known whether cell proliferation is sufficient to drive epithelial cell migration during homoeostatic turnover of the epithelium. Nor is it known precisely how villus cell migration is affected when proliferation is perturbed. Some reports suggest that proliferation and migration may not be related while other studies support a direct relationship. We used established cell-tracking methods based on thymine analog cell labeling and developed tailored mathematical models to quantify cell proliferation and migration under normal conditions and when proliferation is reduced and when it is temporarily halted. We found that epithelial cell migration velocities along the villi are coupled to cell proliferation rates within the crypts in all conditions. Furthermore, halting and resuming proliferation results in the synchronized response of cell migration on the villi. We conclude that cell proliferation within the crypt is the primary force that drives cell migration along the villus. This methodology can be applied to interrogate intestinal epithelial dynamics and characterize situations in which processes involved in cell turnover become uncoupled, including pharmacological treatments and disease models.-Parker, A., Maclaren, O. J., Fletcher, A. G., Muraro, D., Kreuzaler, P. A., Byrne, H. M., Maini, P. K., Watson, A. J. M., Pin, C. Cell proliferation within small intestinal crypts is the principal driving force for cell migration on villi.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticCell MovementCell ProliferationCytarabineFemaleIntestine, SmallMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticCytarabineepitheliummathematical modelsmall intestine

Identifiers

PMID27811059
PMCPMC5241155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.