Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27810968›Full record

ArticleOpen biology2016

Physicochemical properties that control protein aggregation also determine whether a protein is retained or released from necrotic cells.

Andre L Samson, Bosco Ho, Amanda E Au, Simone M Schoenwaelder, Mark J Smyth, Stephen P Bottomley, Oded Kleifeld, Robert L Medcalf

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Andre L SamsonAustralian Centre for Blood Diseases, Alfred Medical Research and Education Precinct (AMREP), Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia andre.laval.samson@gmail.com andre.samson@hri.org.au.ORCID 0000-0002-0637-2716
Bosco HoDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Amanda E AuAustralian Centre for Blood Diseases, Alfred Medical Research and Education Precinct (AMREP), Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia.
Simone M SchoenwaelderAustralian Centre for Blood Diseases, Alfred Medical Research and Education Precinct (AMREP), Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia.
Mark J SmythImmunology in Cancer and Infection Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland 4006, Australia.
Stephen P BottomleyDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Oded KleifeldDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Robert L MedcalfAustralian Centre for Blood Diseases, Alfred Medical Research and Education Precinct (AMREP), Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia.
Monash University · AUThe University of Sydney · AUTechnion – Israel Institute of Technology · ILThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amyloidogenic protein aggregation impairs cell function and is a hallmark of many chronic degenerative disorders. Protein aggregation is also a major event during acute injury; however, unlike amyloidogenesis, the process of injury-induced protein aggregation remains largely undefined. To provide this insight, we profiled the insoluble proteome of several cell types after acute injury. These experiments show that the disulfide-driven process of nucleocytoplasmic coagulation (NCC) is the main form of injury-induced protein aggregation. NCC is mechanistically distinct from amyloidogenesis, but still broadly impairs cell function by promoting the aggregation of hundreds of abundant and essential intracellular proteins. A small proportion of the intracellular proteome resists NCC and is instead released from necrotic cells. Notably, the physicochemical properties of NCC-resistant proteins are contrary to those of NCC-sensitive proteins. These observations challenge the dogma that liberation of constituents during necrosis is anarchic. Rather, inherent physicochemical features including cysteine content, hydrophobicity and intrinsic disorder determine whether a protein is released from necrotic cells. Furthermore, as half of the identified NCC-resistant proteins are known autoantigens, we propose that physicochemical properties that control NCC also affect immune tolerance and other host responses important for the restoration of homeostasis after necrotic injury.

Indexed as

Protein AggregatesApoptosisCell LineCell NucleusCell SurvivalCytoplasmEtoposideFas Ligand ProteinHumansJurkat CellsProteomeProteomicsStaurosporineEtoposideFas Ligand ProteinProtein AggregatesProteomeStaurosporinedisulfideimmune tolerancenecrosisprotein aggregationproteomicsRNA-binding protein FUS

Identifiers

PMID27810968
PMCPMC5133435
OpenAlexW2546598462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.