Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27810703›Full record

ArticlePsychoneuroendocrinology2017

Histone deacetylase and acetyltransferase inhibitors modulate behavioral responses to social stress.

Katharine E McCann, Anna M Rosenhauer, Genna M F Jones, Alisa Norvelle, Dennis C Choi, Kim L Huhman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Epigenetic Regulation of Fungal Secondary Metabolism.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. The role of the microbiome in the neurobiology of social behaviour.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2020
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katharine E McCannNeuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, 161 Jesse Hill Jr. Drive, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA. Electronic address: kmccann3@gsu.edu.
Anna M RosenhauerNeuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, 161 Jesse Hill Jr. Drive, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA. Electronic address: arosenhauer1@student.gsu.edu.
Genna M F JonesNeuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, 161 Jesse Hill Jr. Drive, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA. Electronic address: gjones26@student.gsu.edu.
Alisa NorvelleNeuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, 161 Jesse Hill Jr. Drive, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA. Electronic address: anorvelle@gsu.edu.
Dennis C ChoiNeuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, 161 Jesse Hill Jr. Drive, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA. Electronic address: dchoi15@gsu.edu.
Kim L HuhmanNeuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, 161 Jesse Hill Jr. Drive, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA. Electronic address: khuhman@gsu.edu.
Georgia State University · US

Funding

Neurobiology of Social BehaviorR01MH062044 · NIMH · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HUHMAN, KIM L · 2002 to 2017
$4.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH062044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Histone acetylation has emerged as a critical factor regulating learning and memory both during and after exposure to stressful stimuli. There are drugs that we now know affect histone acetylation that are already in use in clinical populations. The current study uses these drugs to examine the consequences of acutely increasing or decreasing histone acetylation during exposure to social stress. Using an acute model of social defeat in Syrian hamsters, we systemically and site-specifically administered drugs that alter histone acetylation and measured subsequent behavior and immediate-early gene activity. We found that systemic administration of a histone deacetylase inhibitor enhances social stress-induced behavioral responses in males and females. We also found that systemic administration completely blocks defeat-induced neuronal activation, as measured by Fos-immunoreactivity, in the infralimbic cortex, but not in the amygdala, after a mild social defeat stressor. Lastly, we demonstrated that site-specific administration of histone deacetylase inhibitors in the infralimbic region of the prefrontal cortex, but not in the basolateral amygdala, mimics the systemic effect. Conversely, decreasing acetylation by inhibiting histone acetyltransferases in the infralimbic cortex reduces behavioral responses to defeat. This is the first demonstration that acute pharmacological manipulation of histone acetylation during social defeat alters subsequent behavioral responses in both males and females. These results reveal that even systemic administration of drugs that alter histone acetylation can significantly alter behavioral responses to social stress and highlight the importance of the infralimbic cortex in mediating this effect.

Indexed as

Social BehaviorAcetyltransferasesAnimalsBehavior, AnimalCricetinaeFemaleHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsMaleMesocricetusPrefrontal CortexStress, PsychologicalAcetyltransferasesHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsEpigeneticsMedial prefrontal cortexSocial defeatValproic acid

Identifiers

PMID27810703
PMCPMC5135625
OpenAlexW2532397763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.