Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27810337›Full record

ReviewBiochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer2017

PhyloOncology: Understanding cancer through phylogenetic analysis.

Jason A Somarelli, Kathryn E Ware, Rumen Kostadinov, Jeffrey M Robinson, Hakima Amri, Mones Abu-Asab, Nicolaas Fourie, Rui Diogo, David Swofford, Jeffrey P Townsend

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Resolving tumor evolution: a phylogenetic approach.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Biology and medicine in the landscape of quantum advantages.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Hallmarks of Cancer as Ecologically Driven Phenotypes.Frontiers in ecology and evolution · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Neutral Theory and the Somatic Evolution of Cancer.Molecular biology and evolution · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Jason A SomarelliDuke Cancer Institute and the Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States. Electronic address: jason.somarelli@duke.edu.
Kathryn E WareDuke Cancer Institute and the Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States.
Rumen KostadinovPediatric Oncology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, United States.
Jeffrey M RobinsonAnatomy Department, College of Medicine, Howard University, Washington, DC 20059, United States; Digestive Disorders Unit, National Institute of Nursing Research, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, United States.
Hakima AmriDepartment of Biochemistry and Cellular and Molecular Biology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, United States.
Mones Abu-AsabSection of Ultrastructural Biology, National Eye Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, United States.
Nicolaas FourieDigestive Disorders Unit, National Institute of Nursing Research, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, United States.
Rui DiogoAnatomy Department, College of Medicine, Howard University, Washington, DC 20059, United States.
David SwoffordDepartment of Biology, Duke University Trinity College of Arts and Sciences, Durham, NC 27710, United States.
Jeffrey P TownsendDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale University, United States; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, United States; Department of Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, United States. Electronic address: Jeffrey.Townsend@Yale.edu.
Duke Medical Center · USHoward University · USDuke University · USGeorgetown University · USJohns Hopkins University · USNational Eye Institute · USNational Institute of Nursing Research · USYale University · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 EY999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite decades of research and an enormity of resultant data, cancer remains a significant public health problem. New tools and fresh perspectives are needed to obtain fundamental insights, to develop better prognostic and predictive tools, and to identify improved therapeutic interventions. With increasingly common genome-scale data, one suite of algorithms and concepts with potential to shed light on cancer biology is phylogenetics, a scientific discipline used in diverse fields. From grouping subsets of cancer samples to tracing subclonal evolution during cancer progression and metastasis, the use of phylogenetics is a powerful systems biology approach. Well-developed phylogenetic applications provide fast, robust approaches to analyze high-dimensional, heterogeneous cancer data sets. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Evolutionary principles - heterogeneity in cancer?, edited by Dr. Robert A. Gatenby.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenetic FitnessPhylogenyAdaptation, PhysiologicalAlgorithmsAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorCell Transformation, NeoplasticGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenomicsHeredityHumansModels, GeneticMutationNeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCancer stratificationCancer typesClonal evolutionTumor heterogeneityTumor trees

Identifiers

PMID27810337
PMCPMC9583457
OpenAlexW2542993875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.