ReviewMayo Clinic proceedings2016
The Promise and Peril of Precision Medicine: Phenotyping Still Matters Most.
Review in Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.
- 2020 APHRS/HRS expert consensus statement on the investigation of decedents with sudden unexplained death and patients with sudden cardiac arrest, and of their families.Heart rhythm · 2021Guideline
- Perceptions of genetic variant reclassification in patients with inherited cardiac disease.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2019Trial
- KCNH2-L693P Causes Long QT Syndrome Type 2 Through hERG Channel Dysfunction: Functional Validation of a Variant of Uncertain Significance.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2025Article
- Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia: A narrative review of recent advances in genetics, mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment.Asian heart journal · 2025Review
- Exploring transcriptomic signatures in sudden unexplained death (SUD) cases.International journal of legal medicine · 2025Article
- Ethical Issues in Pediatric Precision Oncology in Singapore.Asian bioethics review · 2025Article
- Integrating deep phenotyping with genetic analysis: a comprehensive workflow for diagnosis and management of rare bone diseases.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
- Major Causes of Conflicting Interpretations of Variant Pathogenicity in Rare Disease: A Systematic Analysis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- From genes to clinical management: A comprehensive review of long QT syndrome pathogenesis and treatment.Heart rhythm O2 · 2024Review
- Multi-site validation of a functional assay to adjudicatemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- DECIPHER: Improving Genetic Diagnosis Through Dynamic Integration of Genomic and Clinical Data.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2023Review
- European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)/Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS)/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS) Expert Consensus Statement on the state of genetic testing for cardiac diseases.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022Article
- European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)/Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS)/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS) Expert Consensus Statement on the state of genetic testing for cardiac diseases.Journal of arrhythmia · 2022Article
- Plastic diagnostics: The remaking of disease and evidence in personalized medicine.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2022Article
- The promise of public health ethics for precision medicine: the case of newborn preventive genomic sequencing.Human genetics · 2022Review
- Variant interpretation in molecular autopsy: a useful dilemma.International journal of legal medicine · 2022Article
- Challenges in genetic testing: clinician variant interpretation processes and the impact on clinical care.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021Article
- 2020 APHRS/HRS expert consensus statement on the investigation of decedents with sudden unexplained death and patients with sudden cardiac arrest, and of their families.Journal of arrhythmia · 2021Article
- Cardiogenetics, 25 years a growing subspecialism.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2020Review
- A computational model of induced pluripotent stem-cell derived cardiomyocytes for high throughput risk stratification of KCNQ1 genetic variants.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We illustrate the work necessary to reverse course after identification of a KCNQ1 variant interpreted erroneously as causing long QT syndrome (LQTS) and to identify the true cause of a case of sudden death in the young. Surrogate genetic testing of a decedent's living brother identified a rare KCNQ1-V133I variant, which prompted an implantable cardioverter defibrillator and subsequent diagnosis of LQTS in other family members. Subsequently, this presumed LQT1 family came to our institution for further clinical evaluation and research-based investigations, including KCNQ1-V133I variant-specific analysis of the decedent, heterologous expression studies of KCNQ1-V133I, and a whole-exome molecular autopsy along with genomic triangulation using his unaffected parents' DNA. After evaluating several V133I-positive family members, clinical doubt was cast on the veracity of the previously levied diagnosis of LQT1, resulting in a re-opening of the case and an intense pursuit of the lethal substrate. Furthermore, the decedent tested negative for V133I, and heterologous expression studies demonstrated a normal cellular phenotype for V133I-containing Kv7.1 channels. Instead, after whole-exome molecular autopsy, a de novo pathogenic variant (p.R454W) in DES-encoded desmin was identified. As detailed herein, the forensic evaluation of sudden death in the young requires meticulous focus on the decedent followed by a careful and deliberate assessment of the decedent's relatives. Surrogate genetic testing can have disastrous consequences and should be avoided. Genetic test results require careful scrutiny to avoid unintended and potentially devastating repercussions. Although the root cause of the decedent's tragic death would have remained a mystery, the unintended consequences for the living relatives described herein might have been avoided based on clinical grounds alone. All family members had electrocardiograms with normal QT intervals, making the diagnosis of familial LQTS unlikely. As such, if the clinicians caring for these patients had focused solely on clinical data from the survivors, there might have been no reason to embark on a path of inappropriate treatment based on genetic testing.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.