Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27809867›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2016

Coronary microvascular function and myocardial fibrosis in women with angina pectoris and no obstructive coronary artery disease: the iPOWER study.

Naja Dam Mygind, Marie Mide Michelsen, Adam Pena, Abbas Ali Qayyum, Daria Frestad, Thomas Emil Christensen, Adam Ali Ghotbi, Nynne Dose, Rebekka Faber, Niels Vejlstrup and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2017.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging identifies reduced flow reserve in microvascular coronary artery disease.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2018
    Article
  19. Review of Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) 2015-2016 and transition of the JCMR office to Boston.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2017
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Naja Dam MygindDepartment of Cardiology, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. naja.dam.mygind.02@regionh.dk.
Marie Mide MichelsenDepartment of Cardiology, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Adam PenaDepartment of Cardiology, Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Abbas Ali QayyumDepartment of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Daria FrestadDepartment of Cardiology, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Thomas Emil ChristensenDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Adam Ali GhotbiDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nynne DoseDepartment of Cardiology, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rebekka FaberDepartment of Cardiology, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Niels VejlstrupDepartment of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Philip HasbakDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Andreas KjaerDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eva PrescottDepartment of Cardiology, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jens KastrupDepartment of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
steering committee of the iPower study
University of Copenhagen · DKRigshospitalet · DKBispebjerg Hospital · DKGentofte Hospital · DKHvidovre Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEven in absence of obstructive coronary artery disease women with angina pectoris have a poor prognosis possibly due to coronary microvascular disease. Coronary microvascular disease can be assessed by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography measuring coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) and by positron emission tomography measuring myocardial blood flow reserve (MBFR). Diffuse myocardial fibrosis can be assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) T1 mapping. We hypothesized that coronary microvascular disease is associated with diffuse myocardial fibrosis.

methodsWomen with angina, a clinically indicated coronary angiogram with <50 % stenosis and no diabetes were included. CFVR was measured using dipyridamole (0.84 mg/kg) and MBFR using adenosine (0.84 mg/kg). Focal fibrosis was assessed by 1.5 T CMR late gadolinium enhancement (0.1 mmol/kg) and diffuse myocardial fibrosis by T1 mapping using a modified Look-Locker pulse sequence measuring T1 and extracellular volume fraction (ECV).

resultsCFVR and CMR were performed in 64 women, mean (SD) age 62.5 (8.3) years. MBFR was performed in a subgroup of 54 (84 %) of these women. Mean native T1 was 1023 (86) and ECV (%) was 33.7 (3.5); none had focal fibrosis. Median (IQR) CFVR was 2.3 (1.9; 2.7), 23 (36 %) had CFVR < 2 indicating coronary microvascular disease, and median MBFR was 2.7 (2.2; 3.0) and 19 (35 %) had a MBFR value below 2.5. No significant correlations were found between CFVR and ECV or native T1 (R

conclusionIn women with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease we found no association between measures of coronary microvascular disease and myocardial fibrosis, suggesting that myocardial ischemia induced by coronary microvascular disease does not elicit myocardial fibrosis in this population. The examined parameters seem to provide independent information about myocardial and coronary disease.

Indexed as

Coronary CirculationEchocardiography, DopplerMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMicrocirculationPositron-Emission TomographyAgedAngina PectorisContrast MediaCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsDenmarkFemaleFibrosisHumansMiddle AgedContrast MediagadobutrolOrganometallic CompoundsVasodilator AgentsAngina pectorisCardiovascular magnetic resonanceCoronary flow velocity reserveDiffuse fibrosisDoppler echocardiographyExtracellular volumeMicrovascular dysfunctionPositron emission tomographyT1 mappingWomen

Identifiers

PMID27809867
PMCPMC5096323
OpenAlexW2543888942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.