Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27809857›Full record

ArticleJournal of nanobiotechnology2016

High efficiency penetration of antibody-immobilized nanoneedle thorough plasma membrane for in situ detection of cytoskeletal proteins in living cells.

R Kawamura, K Shimizu, Y Matsumoto, A Yamagishi, Y R Silberberg, M Iijima, S Kuroda, K Fukazawa, K Ishihara, C Nakamura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Nanoneedle-Based Materials for Intracellular Studies.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  6. High-Aspect-Ratio Nanostructured Surfaces as Biological Metamaterials.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

R KawamuraBiomedical Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Central5 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8565, Japan.
K ShimizuDepartment of Biotechnology and Life Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 2-24-26 Naka-cho, Koganei, Tokyo, 184-8588, Japan.
Y MatsumotoDepartment of Biotechnology and Life Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 2-24-26 Naka-cho, Koganei, Tokyo, 184-8588, Japan.
A YamagishiBiomedical Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Central5 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8565, Japan.
Y R SilberbergBiomedical Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Central5 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8565, Japan.
M IijimaDepartment of Biomolecular Science and Reaction, The Institute of Scientific and Industrial Research, Osaka University, 8-1 Mihogaoka, Ibaraki, Osaka, 567-0047, Japan.
S KurodaDepartment of Biomolecular Science and Reaction, The Institute of Scientific and Industrial Research, Osaka University, 8-1 Mihogaoka, Ibaraki, Osaka, 567-0047, Japan.
K FukazawaDepartment of Materials Engineering, School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8654, Japan.
K IshiharaDepartment of Materials Engineering, School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8654, Japan.
C NakamuraBiomedical Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Central5 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8565, Japan. chikashi-nakamura@aist.go.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8012-2192

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe field of structural dynamics of cytoskeletons in living cells is gathering wide interest, since better understanding of cytoskeleton intracellular organization will provide us with not only insights into basic cell biology but may also enable development of new strategies in regenerative medicine and cancer therapy, fields in which cytoskeleton-dependent dynamics play a pivotal role. The nanoneedle technology is a powerful tool allowing for intracellular investigations, as it can be directly inserted into live cells by penetrating through the plasma membrane causing minimal damage to cells, under the precise manipulation using atomic force microscope. Modifications of the nanoneedles using antibodies have allowed for accurate mechanical detection of various cytoskeletal components, including actin, microtubules and intermediate filaments. However, successful penetration of the nanoneedle through the plasma membrane has been shown to vary greatly between different cell types and conditions. In an effort to overcome this problem and improve the success rate of nanoneedle insertion into the live cells, we have focused here on the fluidity of the membrane lipid bilayer, which may hinder nanoneedle penetration into the cytosolic environment.

resultsWe aimed to reduce apparent fluidity of the membrane by either increasing the approach velocity or reducing experimental temperatures. Although changes in approach velocity did not have much effect, lowering the temperature was found to greatly improve the detection of unbinding forces, suggesting that alteration in the plasma membrane fluidity led to increase in nanoneedle penetration.

conclusionsOperation at a lower temperature of 4 °C greatly improved the success rate of nanoneedle insertion to live cells at an optimized approach velocity, while it did not affect the binding of antibodies immobilized on the nanoneedle to vimentins for mechanical detection. As these experimental parameters can be applied to various cell types, these results may improve the versatility of the nanoneedle technology to other cell lines and platforms.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ImmobilizedCytoskeletal ProteinsHeLa CellsHumansMCF-7 CellsMicroscopy, Atomic ForceMicroscopy, FluorescenceNanotechnologyNeedlesSingle-Cell AnalysisAntibodies, ImmobilizedCytoskeletal ProteinsAtomic force microscopyCytoskeletonIntermediate filamentMechanobiologyNanoneedleSingle cell analysis

Identifiers

PMID27809857
PMCPMC5094046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.