Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27809843›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2016

Risks and benefits of combining denosumab and surgery in giant cell tumor of bone-a case series.

Daniel A Müller, Giovanni Beltrami, Guido Scoccianti, Domenico A Campanacci, Alessandro Franchi, Rodolfo Capanna

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Benign tumors of the chest wall.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel A MüllerDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital Balgrist, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zürich, Switzerland. daniel.mueller@balgrist.ch.
Giovanni BeltramiDepartment of Orthopedic Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Firenze, Italy.
Guido ScocciantiDepartment of Orthopedic Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Firenze, Italy.
Domenico A CampanacciDepartment of Traumatology and Orthopedic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Firenze, Italy.
Alessandro FranchiDivision of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Firenze, Italy.
Rodolfo CapannaDepartment of Orthopedic Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Firenze, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITUniversitätsklinik Balgrist · CHUniversity of Florence · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe RANK ligand inhibitor denosumab is being investigated for treatment of giant cell tumor of bone, but the available data in the literature remains sparse and controversial. This study analyzes the results of combining denosumab with surgical treatment and highlights possible changes for the oncologic surgeon in daily practice.

methodsA total of 91 patients were treated surgically for giant cell tumor of bone between 2010 and 2014 in an institution, whereas 25 patients of the total additionally received denosumab and were part of this study. The average age of the patients was 35 years. Eleven patients received denosumab pre- and postoperatively, whereas with 14 patients, the denosumab treatment was applied either before (7 patients) or after (7 patients) the surgery. The average preoperative therapy duration was 3.9 months and the postoperative therapy 6 months by default.

resultsSixteen patients presented a large tumor extension necessitating a resection of the involved bone or joint. In 10 of these patients, the indication for a resection procedure was abandoned due to the preoperative denosumab treatment and a curettage was performed. In the remaining six cases, the surgical indication was not changed despite the denosumab treatment, and two of them needed a joint replacement after the tumor resection. Also with patients treated with curettage, denosumab seems to facilitate the procedure as a new peripheral bone rim around the tumor was built, though a histologic analysis reveals viable tumor cells persisting in the denosumab-induced bone formation. After an average follow-up of 23 months, one histologically proven local recurrence occurred, necessitating a second curettage. A second patient showed a lesion in the postoperative imaging highly suspicious for local relapse which remained stable under further denosumab treatment. No adverse effect of the denosumab medication was observed in this study.

conclusionsDenosumab can be a help to the oncologic surgeon by reconstituting a peripheral rim and switching the stage from aggressive to active or latent disease. But as tumor cells remain in the new-formed bone, the surgical technique of curettage has to be changed from gentle to more aggressive to avoid higher local recurrence rates.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBone Density Conservation AgentsBone NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantCurettageDenosumabFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGiant Cell Tumor of BoneHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRANK LigandBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabRANK LigandTNFSF11 protein, humanAdjuvant treatmentBenign tumorBoneDenosumabGiant cell tumorSurgery

Identifiers

PMID27809843
PMCPMC5095954
OpenAlexW2548999407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.