Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27809783›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2016

Transcriptomic data from panarthropods shed new light on the evolution of insulator binding proteins in insects : Insect insulator proteins.

Thomas Pauli, Lucia Vedder, Daniel Dowling, Malte Petersen, Karen Meusemann, Alexander Donath, Ralph S Peters, Lars Podsiadlowski, Christoph Mayer, Shanlin Liu and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Functional genomics in Spiralia.Briefings in functional genomics · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Thomas PauliCenter of Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, 51113, Bonn, Germany. s6thpaul@uni-bonn.de.ORCID 0000-0002-5673-974X
Lucia VedderUniversity of Tübingen, Geschwister-Scholl-Platz, 72074, Tübingen, Germany.
Daniel DowlingJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Institute of Molecular Biology (IMB), Ackermannweg 4, 55128, Mainz, Germany.
Malte PetersenCenter of Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, 51113, Bonn, Germany.
Karen MeusemannCenter of Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, 51113, Bonn, Germany.
Alexander DonathCenter of Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, 51113, Bonn, Germany.
Ralph S PetersZoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Arthropod Department, Adenauerallee 160, 53113, Bonn, Germany.
Lars PodsiadlowskiUniversity of Bonn, Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, An der Immenburg 1, 53121, Bonn, Germany.
Christoph MayerCenter of Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, 51113, Bonn, Germany.
Shanlin LiuChina National GeneBank-Shenzhen, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, 518083, China.
Xin ZhouBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Peter HegerUniversity of Cologne, Cologne Biocenter, Institute for Genetics, Zülpicher Straße 47a, 50674, Köln, Germany.
Thomas WieheUniversity of Cologne, Cologne Biocenter, Institute for Genetics, Zülpicher Straße 47a, 50674, Köln, Germany.
Lars HeringDepartment of Zoology, University of Kassel, Heinrich-Plett-Str. 40, 34132, Kassel, Germany.
Georg MayerDepartment of Zoology, University of Kassel, Heinrich-Plett-Str. 40, 34132, Kassel, Germany.
Bernhard MisofCenter of Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, 51113, Bonn, Germany.
Oliver NiehuisCenter of Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, 51113, Bonn, Germany. oliver.niehuis@gmail.com.
Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig · DEUniversity of Cologne · DEUniversity of Kassel · DEChina Agricultural University · CNCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversity of Bonn · DEUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBody plan development in multi-cellular organisms is largely determined by homeotic genes. Expression of homeotic genes, in turn, is partially regulated by insulator binding proteins (IBPs). While only a few enhancer blocking IBPs have been identified in vertebrates, the common fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster harbors at least twelve different enhancer blocking IBPs. We screened recently compiled insect transcriptomes from the 1KITE project and genomic and transcriptomic data from public databases, aiming to trace the origin of IBPs in insects and other arthropods.

resultsOur study shows that the last common ancestor of insects (Hexapoda) already possessed a substantial number of IBPs. Specifically, of the known twelve insect IBPs, at least three (i.e., CP190, Su(Hw), and CTCF) already existed prior to the evolution of insects. Furthermore we found GAF orthologs in early branching insect orders, including Zygentoma (silverfish and firebrats) and Diplura (two-pronged bristletails). Mod(mdg4) is most likely a derived feature of Neoptera, while Pita is likely an evolutionary novelty of holometabolous insects. Zw5 appears to be restricted to schizophoran flies, whereas BEAF-32, ZIPIC and the Elba complex, are probably unique to the genus Drosophila. Selection models indicate that insect IBPs evolved under neutral or purifying selection.

conclusionsOur results suggest that a substantial number of IBPs either pre-date the evolution of insects or evolved early during insect evolution. This suggests an evolutionary history of insulator binding proteins in insects different to that previously thought. Moreover, our study demonstrates the versatility of the 1KITE transcriptomic data for comparative analyses in insects and other arthropods.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularInsulator ElementsTranscriptomeAnimalsArthropodsDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila melanogasterEnhancer Elements, GeneticGene Expression ProfilingPhylogenyDNA-Binding ProteinsArthropod evolutionComparative transcriptomic analysesGene evolutionInsulator binding proteins

Identifiers

PMID27809783
PMCPMC5094011
OpenAlexW2559134725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.