Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27809777›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2016

Unsupervised gene set testing based on random matrix theory.

H Robert Frost, Christopher I Amos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

H Robert FrostDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, 03755, NH, USA. rob.frost@dartmouth.edu.
Christopher I AmosDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, 03755, NH, USA.

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Fred W Kolling IV · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
Transdisciplinary Research in Cancer of the Lung (TRICL)U19CA148127 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI AMOS, CHRISTOPHER I., LE MARCHAND, LOIC · 2010 to 2014
$10.9M
Quantitative Biology Research InstituteP20GM103534 · NIGMS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI AMOS, CHRISTOPHER I. · 2012 to 2016
$8.6M
Coordinating Center: Molecular and Cellular Findings of Screen-Detected LesionsU01CA196386 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI AMOS, CHRISTOPHER I. · 2015 to 2020
$4.1M
Tissue-specific gene set testingK01LM012426 · NLM · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI FROST, HILDRETH · 2016 to 2018
$259k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108NCI NIH HHS U01 CA196386NCI NIH HHS U19 CA148127NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103534NLM NIH HHS K01 LM012426
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGene set testing, or pathway analysis, is a bioinformatics technique that performs statistical testing on biologically meaningful sets of genomic variables. Although originally developed for supervised analyses, i.e., to test the association between gene sets and an outcome variable, gene set testing also has important unsupervised applications, e.g., p-value weighting. For unsupervised testing, however, few effective gene set testing methods are available with support especially poor for several biologically relevant use cases.

resultsIn this paper, we describe two new unsupervised gene set testing methods based on random matrix theory, the Marc̆enko-Pastur Distribution Test (MPDT) and the Tracy-Widom Test (TWT), that support both self-contained and competitive null hypotheses. For the self-contained case, we contrast our proposed tests with the classic multivariate test based on a modified likelihood ratio criterion. For the competitive case, we compare the new tests against a competitive version of the classic test and our recently developed Spectral Gene Set Enrichment (SGSE) method. Evaluation of the TWT and MPDT methods is based on both simulation studies and a weighted p-value analysis of two real gene expression data sets using gene sets drawn from MSigDB collections.

conclusionsThe MPDT and TWT methods are novel and effective tools for unsupervised gene set analysis with superior statistical performance relative to existing techniques and the ability to generate biologically important results on real genomic data sets.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, TheoreticalBiomarkers, TumorComputer SimulationGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksGenomicsHumansLeukemiaBiomarkers, TumorGene set testingMarc̆enko-PasturPathway analysisRandom matrix theoryTracy-Widom

Identifiers

PMID27809777
PMCPMC5096314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.