Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27809770›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2016

Knowledge, attitudes and practices towards antibiotic use in upper respiratory tract infections among patients seeking primary health care in Singapore.

Darius Shaw Teng Pan, Joyce Huixin Huang, Magdalene Hui Min Lee, Yue Yu, Mark I-Cheng Chen, Ee Hui Goh, Lili Jiang, Joash Wen Chen Chong, Yee Sin Leo, Tau Hong Lee and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Darius Shaw Teng PanYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Health System, National University of Singapore, 119228, Singapore, Singapore.
Joyce Huixin HuangYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Health System, National University of Singapore, 119228, Singapore, Singapore.
Magdalene Hui Min LeeYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Health System, National University of Singapore, 119228, Singapore, Singapore.
Yue YuYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Health System, National University of Singapore, 119228, Singapore, Singapore.
Mark I-Cheng ChenSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University Health System, National University of Singapore, 12 Science Drive 2, 117549, Singapore, Singapore. mark.chen.ic@gmail.com.
Ee Hui GohSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University Health System, National University of Singapore, 12 Science Drive 2, 117549, Singapore, Singapore.
Lili JiangSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University Health System, National University of Singapore, 12 Science Drive 2, 117549, Singapore, Singapore.
Joash Wen Chen ChongSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University Health System, National University of Singapore, 12 Science Drive 2, 117549, Singapore, Singapore.
Yee Sin LeoYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Health System, National University of Singapore, 119228, Singapore, Singapore.
Tau Hong LeeInstitute of Infectious Diseases & Epidemiology, Communicable Disease Centre, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 308433, Singapore, Singapore.
Chia Siong WongInstitute of Infectious Diseases & Epidemiology, Communicable Disease Centre, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 308433, Singapore, Singapore.
Victor Weng Keong LohDivision of Family Medicine, Department of Medicine, University Medicine Cluster, National University Hospital System, 119228, Singapore, Singapore.
Adrian Zhongxian PohFrontier Healthcare group, 400305, Singapore, Singapore.
Tat Yean ThamYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Health System, National University of Singapore, 119228, Singapore, Singapore.
Wei Mon WongDivision of Family Medicine, Department of Medicine, University Medicine Cluster, National University Hospital System, 119228, Singapore, Singapore.
Fong Seng LimYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Health System, National University of Singapore, 119228, Singapore, Singapore.
National University Health System · SGNational Centre for Infectious Diseases · SGNational University Hospital · SGNational University of Singapore · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients' expectations can influence antibiotic prescription by primary healthcare physicians. We assessed knowledge, attitude and practices towards antibiotic use for upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs), and whether knowledge is associated with increased expectations for antibiotics among patients visiting primary healthcare services in Singapore.

methodsData was collected through a cross-sectional interviewer-assisted survey of patients aged ≥21 years waiting to see primary healthcare practitioners for one or more symptoms suggestive of URTI (cough, sore throat, runny nose or blocked nose) for 7 days or less, covering the demographics, presenting symptoms, knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and practices of URTI and associated antibiotic use. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to assess independent factors associated with patients' expectations for antibiotics.

resultsNine hundred fourteen out of 987 eligible patients consulting 35 doctors were recruited from 24 private sector primary care clinics in Singapore. A third (307/907) expected antibiotics, of which a substantial proportion would ask the doctor for antibiotics (121/304, 40 %) and/or see another doctor (31/304, 10 %) if antibiotics were not prescribed. The majority agreed "antibiotics are effective against viruses" (715/914, 78 %) and that "antibiotics cure URTI faster" (594/912, 65 %). Inappropriate antibiotic practices include "keeping antibiotics stock at home" (125/913, 12 %), "taking leftover antibiotics" (114/913, 14 %) and giving antibiotics to family members (62/913, 7 %). On multivariate regression, the following factors were independently associated with wanting antibiotics (odds ratio; 95 % confidence interval): Malay ethnicity (1.67; 1.00-2.79), living in private housing (1.69; 1.13-2.51), presence of sore throat (1.50; 1.07-2.10) or fever (1.46; 1.01-2.12), perception that illness is serious (1.70; 1.27-2.27), belief that antibiotics cure URTI faster (5.35; 3.76-7.62) and not knowing URTI resolves on its own (2.18; 1.08-2.06), while post-secondary education (0.67; 0.48-0.94) was inversely associated. Those with lower educational levels were significantly more likely to have multiple misconceptions about antibiotics.

conclusionMajority of patients seeking primary health care in Singapore are misinformed about the role of antibiotics in URTI. Agreeing with the statement that antibiotics cure URTI faster was most strongly associated with wanting antibiotics. Those with higher educational levels were less likely to want antibiotics, while those with lower educational levels more likely to have incorrect knowledge.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePrimary Health CareAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesEducational StatusFemaleFeverHumansMalaysiaMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePharyngitisResidence CharacteristicsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic useEducational levelPrimary healthcareSingaporeUpper Respiratory Tract Infections (URTIs)

Identifiers

PMID27809770
PMCPMC5094024
OpenAlexW2547964685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.