Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27809557›Full record

ArticleAIDS research and human retroviruses2017

Comparison of Dapivirine Vaginal Gel and Film Formulation Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics (FAME 02B).

Jennifer A Robinson, Mark A Marzinke, Rahul P Bakshi, Edward J Fuchs, Christine L Radebaugh, Wutyi Aung, Hans M L Spiegel, Jenell S Coleman, Lisa C Rohan, Craig W Hendrix

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS research and human retroviruses, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Vaginally-delivered fast-dissolving antibody tablets (FDAT) for on-demand non-hormonal contraception and multi-purpose protection.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Vaginal Sheets withGels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. A Quantitative Disintegration Method for Polymeric Films.Journal of pharmaceutical innovation · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. On-demand microbicide products: design matters.Drug delivery and translational research · 2017
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jennifer A Robinson1 Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore, Maryland.
Mark A Marzinke2 Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore, Maryland.
Rahul P Bakshi3 Department of Medicine (Clinical Pharmacology), Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore, Maryland.
Edward J Fuchs3 Department of Medicine (Clinical Pharmacology), Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore, Maryland.
Christine L Radebaugh3 Department of Medicine (Clinical Pharmacology), Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore, Maryland.
Wutyi Aung3 Department of Medicine (Clinical Pharmacology), Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore, Maryland.
Hans M L Spiegel4 HJF-DAIDS, a Division of the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Contractor to National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health , Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland.
Jenell S Coleman1 Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore, Maryland.
Lisa C Rohan5 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Craig W Hendrix3 Department of Medicine (Clinical Pharmacology), Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore, Maryland.

Funding

Pharmaceutical and Regulatory CoreU19AI082639 · NIAID · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI FRIEND, DAVID R · 2010 to 2014
$13.0M
Clinical Pharmacology Training ProgramT32GM066691 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Matthew Michael Ippolito · 2003 to 2026
$6.4M
NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272200800014CNIAID NIH HHS U19 AI082639NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM066691
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While preexposure prophylaxis with oral tenofovir/emtricitabine reduces HIV acquisition rates, poor adherence to and acceptability of vaginal gels and the potential for evolving drug resistance have led to development of vaginal film formulations and other antiretroviral drugs, respectively, including the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor dapivirine. In this two-arm crossover study of a novel fast-dissolving dapivirine film and a previously studied semisolid dapivirine gel, 10 healthy women received a single 1.25 mg vaginal dose of each study product; one withdrew after the first dose. Clinical, pharmacokinetic, and antiviral pharmacodynamic assessments (ex vivo HIV-BaL challenge of tissue explants) were performed over 168 h postdose. Six of ten participants experienced mild to moderate adverse effects, similar between products, with no severe adverse events or adverse events attributed to study products. There were no statistically significant differences in plasma, cervicovaginal fluid (CVF), or cervical tissue dapivirine concentrations between the gel and film (all p > .05). CVF dapivirine concentrations were 1.5 and 6 log

Indexed as

Administration, IntravaginalAdolescentAdultAnti-HIV AgentsCervix UteriCross-Over StudiesDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPlasmaPyrimidinesTime FactorsVaginal Creams, Foams, and JelliesYoung AdultAnti-HIV AgentsDapivirinePyrimidinesVaginal Creams, Foams, and JelliesdapivirineHIVpharmacodynamicspharmacokineticspreexposure prophylaxisvaginal filmvaginal gel

Identifiers

PMID27809557
PMCPMC5372771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.