Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27809305›Full record

ArticleCell death & disease2016

Chronic activation of the D156A point mutant of Channelrhodopsin-2 signals apoptotic cell death: the good and the bad.

Michael Perny, Lukas Muri, Heather Dawson, Sonja Kleinlogel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell death & disease, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Dilating the aging clock with light.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Optogenetic control of cancer cell survival in ChR2-transfected HeLa cells.International journal of experimental pathology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Toward the Optical Cochlear Implant.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Cardiac Optogenetics: 2018.JACC. Clinical electrophysiology · 2018
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael PernyInstitute for Physiology, University of Bern, Bern 3012 Switzerland.
Lukas MuriInstitute for Physiology, University of Bern, Bern 3012 Switzerland.
Heather DawsonInstitute of Pathology, Clinical Pathology Division, University of Bern, Bern 3010 Switzerland.
Sonja KleinlogelInstitute for Physiology, University of Bern, Bern 3012 Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8272-7833
University of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) has become a celebrated research tool and is considered a promising potential therapeutic for neurological disorders. While making its way into the clinic, concerns about the safety of chronic ChR2 activation have emerged; in particular as the high-intensity blue light illumination needed for ChR2 activation may be phototoxic. Here we set out to quantify for the first time the cytotoxic effects of chronic ChR2 activation. We studied the safety of prolonged illumination on ChR2(D156A)-expressing human melanoma cells as cancer cells are notorious for their resistance to killing. Three days of illumination eradicated the entire ChR2(D156A)-expressing cell population through mitochondria-mediated apoptosis, whereas blue light activation of non-expressing control cells did not significantly compromise cell viability. In other words, chronic high-intensity blue light illumination alone is not phototoxic, but prolonged ChR2 activation induces mitochondria-mediated apoptosis. The results are alarming for gain-of-function translational neurological studies but open the possibility to optogenetically manipulate the viability of non-excitable cells, such as cancer cells. In a second set of experiments we therefore evaluated the feasibility to put melanoma cell proliferation and apoptosis under the control of light by transdermally illuminating in vivo melanoma xenografts expressing ChR2(D156A). We show clear proof of principle that light treatment inhibits and even reverses tumor growth, rendering ChR2s potential tools for targeted light-therapy of cancers.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisCalciumCell Line, TumorCell Membrane PermeabilityCell ProliferationChannelrhodopsinsG1 PhaseHumansImmunohistochemistryIonophoresLightMelanomaMiceMice, NudeAntineoplastic AgentsCalciumChannelrhodopsinsIonophores

Identifiers

PMID27809305
PMCPMC5260891
OpenAlexW2548538144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.