Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27809294›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2016

Environmental Justice Research: Contemporary Issues and Emerging Topics.

Jayajit Chakraborty, Timothy W Collins, Sara E Grineski

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ecological information and approaches needed for risk communication dialogs for acute or chronic environmental crises.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2022
    Article
  7. Trust and consequences: Role of community science, perceptions, values, and environmental justice in risk communication.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Exercising in Air Pollution: The Cleanest versus Dirtiest Cities Challenge.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jayajit ChakrabortyDepartment of Sociology & Anthropology, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA. jchakraborty@utep.edu.
Timothy W CollinsDepartment of Sociology & Anthropology, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA. twcollins@utep.edu.
Sara E GrineskiDepartment of Sociology & Anthropology, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA. segrineski@utep.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental justice (EJ) research seeks to document and redress the disproportionate environmental burdens and benefits associated with social inequalities. Although its initial focus was on disparities in exposure to anthropogenic pollution, the scope of EJ research has expanded. In the context of intensifying social inequalities and environmental problems, there is a need to further strengthen the EJ research framework and diversify its application. This Special Issue of the

Indexed as

Environmental HealthHealth Status DisparitiesSocial JusticeCanadaEnvironmental ExposureEurope, EasternHumansResearchSocioeconomic FactorsUnited Kingdomair pollutionenergyenvironmental justicefloodfoodgreen spacehealthsocial inequalitysustainabilitywater pollution

Identifiers

PMID27809294
PMCPMC5129282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.