Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27808593›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2017

Is there a role for therapeutic cancer vaccines in the age of checkpoint inhibitors?

Robert O Dillman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Advanced biomaterials for cancer immunotherapy.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Delivery technologies for cancer immunotherapy.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2019
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Robert O Dillmana AiVita Biomedical, Inc. , Irvine , CA , USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because of the recent success of monoclonal antibody checkpoint inhibitors, and the disappointing results of most therapeutic cancer vaccine trials, it has been questioned whether there is any potential role for such products going forward. In my opinion the answer is "yes" based on the following: [1] there is a persistent unmet clinical need because the majority of patients do not benefit from anti-checkpoint therapy, [2] there is evidence that not all patients make immune responses to their tumors, [3] there is evidence that immune responses to autologous tumor antigens can be induced by patient-specific vaccines, [4] there is clinical evidence from the pre-checkpoint era that suggests survival can be positively impacted by such patient-specific vaccines, and [5] the 2 available therapeutic vaccines that have received regulatory approval are quite limited in terms of their therapeutic benefit.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsCancer VaccinesDrug DiscoveryHumansNeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsCancer Vaccinescancer stem cellsdendritic cellspatient-specific neoantigenstherapeutic vaccinestumor associated antigens

Identifiers

PMID27808593
PMCPMC5360141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.