ArticleThe American journal of gastroenterology2016
Editorial: Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Gastroenterology: PROMISed Land or Road to Nowhere?
Article in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond the Eckardt Score: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures in Esophageal Disorders.Current gastroenterology reports · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Incorporating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) into clinical practice is advocated by some. However, the benefits remain uncertain. Almario et al. examined the impact of a gastrointestinal (GI) version of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) on patient satisfaction, perception of doctors' interpersonal skills, and the likelihood of shared decision-making. Patients were allocated to complete GI PROMIS prior to their outpatient appointment, or usual management. Overall, uptake of GI PROMIS was poor and there was no difference in any outcome measure between those completing the questionnaire and those receiving usual management, suggesting PROs may be of limited utility in this setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27808129What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.