Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27807864›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2016

Integrated Approach to Reduce Perinatal Adverse Events: Standardized Processes, Interdisciplinary Teamwork Training, and Performance Feedback.

William Riley, James W Begun, Les Meredith, Kristi K Miller, Kathy Connolly, Rebecca Price, Janet H Muri, Mac McCullough, Stanley Davis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. In situ simulation and its effects on patient outcomes: a systematic review.BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Qualitative Study of Risks Related to Interhospital Transfer of Patients with Nontraumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage.Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

William RileySchool for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0968-4395
James W BegunUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Les MeredithPremier Insurance Management Services, Inc., San Diego, CA.
Kristi K MillerFairview Health Services, Minneapolis, MN.
Kathy ConnollyKTConnolly & Associates, LLC, Charlotte, NC.
Rebecca PricePremier Insurance Management Services, San Diego, CA.
Janet H MuriNational Perinatal Information Center, Providence, RI.
Mac McCulloughSchool for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0070-4943
Stanley DavisIndependent Perinatal Consultant, Edina, MN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo improve safety practices and reduce adverse events in perinatal units of acute care hospitals. DATA SOURCES: Primary data collected from perinatal units of 14 hospitals participating in the intervention between 2008 and 2012. Baseline secondary data collected from the same hospitals between 2006 and 2007. STUDY

designA prospective study involving 342,754 deliveries was conducted using a quality improvement collaborative that supported three primary interventions. Primary measures include adoption of three standardized care processes and four measures of outcomes. DATA COLLECTION

methodsChart audits were conducted to measure the implementation of standardized care processes. Outcome measures were collected and validated by the National Perinatal Information Center. PRINCIPAL

findingsThe hospital perinatal units increased use of all three care processes, raising consolidated overall use from 38 to 81 percent between 2008 and 2012. The harms measured by the Adverse Outcome Index decreased 14 percent, and a run chart analysis revealed two special causes associated with the interventions.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates the ability of hospital perinatal staff to implement efforts to reduce perinatal harm using a quality improvement collaborative. Findings help inform the relationship between the use of standardized care processes, teamwork training, and improved perinatal outcomes, and suggest that a multiplicity of integrated strategies, rather than a single intervention, may be essential to achieve high reliability.

Indexed as

Feedback, PsychologicalPatient Care TeamPractice Guidelines as TopicWork PerformanceDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHospitalsHumansInservice TrainingInterdisciplinary CommunicationMedical ErrorsOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient Care BundlesPerinatal CarePregnancyProspective StudiesHigh reliabilityin situ simulation team trainingperinatal outcomesquality improvement collaborativestandardized care processes

Identifiers

PMID27807864
PMCPMC5134347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.