Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27807811›Full record

ArticleAMB Express2016

Myceliophthora thermophila M77 utilizes hydrolytic and oxidative mechanisms to deconstruct biomass.

Hévila Brognaro Dos Santos, Thaís Milena Souza Bezerra, José G C Pradella, Priscila Delabona, Deise Lima, Eleni Gomes, Steve D Hartson, Janet Rogers, Brian Couger, Rolf Prade

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMB Express, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Secretome Analysis ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Genome and Secretome Analysis ofMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Oxidoreductases and Reactive Oxygen Species in Conversion of Lignocellulosic Biomass.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hévila Brognaro Dos SantosInstituto de Física de São Carlos, Universidade de São Paulo, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Thaís Milena Souza BezerraLaboratório de Enzimologia, Instituto de Química, UNESP, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.
José G C PradellaLaboratório Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia do Bioetanol, Rua Giuseppe Máximo Scolfaro, 10.000, Bairro Guará, Campinas, SP, CEP 13083-970, Brazil.
Priscila DelabonaLaboratório Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia do Bioetanol, Rua Giuseppe Máximo Scolfaro, 10.000, Bairro Guará, Campinas, SP, CEP 13083-970, Brazil.
Deise LimaLaboratório Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia do Bioetanol, Rua Giuseppe Máximo Scolfaro, 10.000, Bairro Guará, Campinas, SP, CEP 13083-970, Brazil.
Eleni GomesLaboratório de Microbiologia e Bioquímica Aplicada, Departamento de Biologia, IBILCE/UNESP, Rua Cristovão Colombo, 2265 Bairro Jd. Nazareth, São José do Rio Preto, SP, CEP 15054-000, Brazil.
Steve D HartsonDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA.
Janet RogersDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA.
Brian CougerDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA.
Rolf PradeDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA. prade@okstate.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8154-9286

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomass is abundant, renewable and useful for biofuel production as well as chemical priming for plastics and composites. Deconstruction of biomass by enzymes is perceived as recalcitrant while an inclusive breakdown mechanism remains to be discovered. Fungi such as Myceliophthora thermophila M77 appear to decompose natural biomass sources quite well. This work reports on this fungus fermentation property while producing cellulolytic enzymes using natural biomass substrates. Little hydrolytic activity was detected, insufficient to explain the large amount of biomass depleted in the process. Furthermore, this work makes a comprehensive account of extracellular proteins and describes how secretomes redirect their qualitative protein content based on the nature and chemistry of the nutritional source. Fungus grown on purified cellulose or on natural biomass produced secretomes constituted by: cellobiohydrolases, cellobiose dehydrogenase, β-1,3 glucanase, β-glucosidases, aldose epimerase, glyoxal oxidase, GH74 xyloglucanase, galactosidase, aldolactonase and polysaccharide monooxygenases. Fungus grown on a mixture of purified hemicellulose fractions (xylans, arabinans and arabinoxylans) produced many enzymes, some of which are listed here: xylosidase, mixed β-1,3(4) glucanase, β-1,3 glucanases, β-glucosidases, β-mannosidase, β-glucosidases, galactosidase, chitinases, polysaccharide lyase, endo β-1,6 galactanase and aldose epimerase. Secretomes produced on natural biomass displayed a comprehensive set of enzymes involved in hydrolysis and oxidation of cellulose, hemicellulose-pectin and lignin. The participation of oxidation reactions coupled to lignin decomposition in the breakdown of natural biomass may explain the discrepancy observed for cellulose decomposition in relation to natural biomass fermentation experiments.

Indexed as

BiomassCellulose degradationCellulose hydrolysisCellulose oxidationMyceliophthora thermophilaSecretome composition

Identifiers

PMID27807811
PMCPMC5093097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.