Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27807712›Full record

ArticleFish physiology and biochemistry2017

The role of extracellular matrix components in pin bone attachments during storage-a comparison between farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and cod (Gadus morhua L.).

Sissel B Rønning, Tone-Kari Østbye, Aleksei Krasnov, Tram T Vuong, Eva Veiseth-Kent, Svein O Kolset, Mona E Pedersen

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Fish physiology and biochemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Potential of Atlantic Codfish (Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sissel B RønningNofima AS, Pb 210, 1431, Ås, Norway. sissel.ronning@nofima.no.
Tone-Kari ØstbyeNofima AS, Pb 210, 1431, Ås, Norway.
Aleksei KrasnovNofima AS, Pb 210, 1431, Ås, Norway.
Tram T VuongNofima AS, Pb 210, 1431, Ås, Norway.
Eva Veiseth-KentNofima AS, Pb 210, 1431, Ås, Norway.
Svein O KolsetDepartment of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Mona E PedersenNofima AS, Pb 210, 1431, Ås, Norway.
Fafo Foundation · NONofima · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pin bones represent a major problem for processing and quality of fish products. Development of methods of removal requires better knowledge of the pin bones' attachment to the muscle and structures involved in the breakdown during loosening. In this study, pin bones from cod and salmon were dissected from fish fillets after slaughter or storage on ice for 5 days, and thereafter analysed with molecular methods, which revealed major differences between these species before and after storage. The connective tissue (CT) attaches the pin bone to the muscle in cod, while the pin bones in salmon are embedded in adipose tissue. Collagens, elastin, lectin-binding proteins and glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) are all components of the attachment site, and this differ between salmon and cod, resulting in a CT in cod that is more resistant to enzymatic degradation compared to the CT in salmon. Structural differences are reflected in the composition of transcriptome. Microarray analysis comparing the attachment sites of the pin bones with a reference muscle sample showed limited differences in salmon. In cod, on the other hand, the variances were substantial, and the gene expression profiles suggested difference in myofibre structure, metabolism and cell processes between the pin bone attachment site and the reference muscle. Degradation of the connective tissue occurs closest to the pin bones and not in the neighbouring tissue, which was shown using light microscopy. This study shows that the attachment of the pin bones in cod and salmon is different; therefore, the development of methods for removal should be tailored to each individual species.

Indexed as

Bone and BonesFood HandlingGadus morhuaSalmo salarAdipose TissueAnimalsConnective TissueExtracellular MatrixMusclesTranscriptomeConnective tissueExtracellular matrixPin boneProteoglycans

Identifiers

PMID27807712
PMCPMC5374190
OpenAlexW2546665721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.