Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27807642›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2017

Improving the Reliability of Tinnitus Screening in Laboratory Animals.

Aikeen Jones, Bradford J May

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Animal Models of Tinnitus: A Review.Otolaryngologic clinics of North America · 2020
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Effects of Acoustic Environment on Tinnitus Behavior in Sound-Exposed Rats.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2018
    Article
  7. Behavioral Animal Model of the Emotional Response to Tinnitus and Hearing Loss.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aikeen JonesDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Traylor Research Building, Room 521, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Bradford J MayDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Traylor Research Building, Room 521, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. bmay@jhu.edu.

Funding

The Histology CoreP30DC005211 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI YOUNG, ERIC DANIEL · 2002 to 2016
$9.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC005211
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behavioral screening remains a contentious issue for animal studies of tinnitus. Most paradigms base a positive tinnitus test on an animal's natural tendency to respond to the "sound" of tinnitus as if it were an actual sound. As a result, animals with tinnitus are expected to display sound-conditioned behaviors when no sound is present or to miss gaps in background sounds because tinnitus "fills in the gap." Reliable confirmation of the behavioral indications of tinnitus can be problematic because the reinforcement contingencies of conventional discrimination tasks break down an animal's tendency to group tinnitus with sound. When responses in silence are rewarded, animals respond in silence regardless of their tinnitus status. When responses in silence are punished, animals stop responding. This study introduces stimulus classification as an alternative approach to tinnitus screening. Classification procedures train animals to respond to the common perceptual features that define a group of sounds (e.g., high pitch or narrow bandwidth). Our procedure trains animals to drink when they hear tinnitus and to suppress drinking when they hear other sounds. Animals with tinnitus are revealed by their tendency to drink in the presence of unreinforced probe sounds that share the perceptual features of the tinnitus classification. The advantages of this approach are illustrated by taking laboratory rats through a testing sequence that includes classification training, the experimental induction of tinnitus, and postinduction screening. Behavioral indications of tinnitus are interpreted and then verified by simulating a known tinnitus percept with objective sounds.

Indexed as

AnimalsEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemGeneralization, ResponseMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReproducibility of ResultsSalicylatesSoundTinnitusSalicylatesconditioned suppressionperceptual groupingsalicylatesound exposurestimulus generalizationtinnitus

Identifiers

PMID27807642
PMCPMC5243267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.