Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27807349›Full record

Trial reportNature communications2016

Induced sensorimotor brain plasticity controls pain in phantom limb patients.

Takufumi Yanagisawa, Ryohei Fukuma, Ben Seymour, Koichi Hosomi, Haruhiko Kishima, Takeshi Shimizu, Hiroshi Yokoi, Masayuki Hirata, Toshiki Yoshimine, Yukiyasu Kamitani and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nature communications, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. MEG-BMI to Control Phantom Limb Pain.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2018
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pathology of pain and its implications for therapeutic interventions.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Fractal Similarity of Pain Brain Networks.Advances in neurobiology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Microglia: sculptors of neuropathic pain?Royal Society open science · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Takufumi YanagisawaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Ryohei FukumaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Ben SeymourDepartment of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Computational and Biological Learning Laboratory, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK.
Koichi HosomiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Haruhiko KishimaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Takeshi ShimizuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Hiroshi YokoiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Intelligent Systems, The University of Electro-Communications, 1-5-1 Chofugaoka, Chofu, Tokyo 182-8585, Japan.
Masayuki HirataDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Toshiki YoshimineDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Yukiyasu KamitaniDepartment of Neuroinformatics, ATR Computational Neuroscience Laboratories, 2-2-2 Hikaridai, Seika-cho, Kyoto 619-0288, Japan.
Youichi SaitohDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Osaka University · JPKyoto Seika University · JPNara Institute of Science and Technology · JPNational Institute of Information and Communications Technology · JPUniversity of Electro-Communications · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cause of pain in a phantom limb after partial or complete deafferentation is an important problem. A popular but increasingly controversial theory is that it results from maladaptive reorganization of the sensorimotor cortex, suggesting that experimental induction of further reorganization should affect the pain, especially if it results in functional restoration. Here we use a brain-machine interface (BMI) based on real-time magnetoencephalography signals to reconstruct affected hand movements with a robotic hand. BMI training induces significant plasticity in the sensorimotor cortex, manifested as improved discriminability of movement information and enhanced prosthetic control. Contrary to our expectation that functional restoration would reduce pain, the BMI training with the phantom hand intensifies the pain. In contrast, BMI training designed to dissociate the prosthetic and phantom hands actually reduces pain. These results reveal a functional relevance between sensorimotor cortical plasticity and pain, and may provide a novel treatment with BMI neurofeedback.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesNeuronal PlasticityAdultBrachial Plexus NeuropathiesHumansMagnetoencephalographyMaleMiddle AgedNeurofeedbackPain ManagementPhantom LimbProstheses and ImplantsSensorimotor Cortex

Identifiers

PMID27807349
PMCPMC5095287
OpenAlexW2544026523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.