Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27807173›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2016

Correlation between Pupil Size and Subjective Passage of Time in Non-Human Primates.

Tomoki W Suzuki, Jun Kunimatsu, Masaki Tanaka

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Temporal Information Processing in the Cerebellum and Basal Ganglia.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  4. Pupillometry tracks errors in interval timing.Behavioral neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Neurobiologically Inspired Self-Monitoring Systems.Proceedings of the IEEE. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · 2020
    Article
  10. Brain Networks Underlying Eye's Pupil Dynamics.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Differentiating between Models of Perceptual Decision Making Using Pupil Size Inferred Confidence.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Neuromodulation of Pupil Diameter and Temporal Perception.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  17. Correlation between Pupil Size and Subjective Passage of Time in Non-Human Primates.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tomoki W SuzukiDepartment of Physiology, Hokkaido University School of Medicine, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan, and.
Jun KunimatsuDepartment of Physiology, Hokkaido University School of Medicine, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan, and.
Masaki TanakaDepartment of Physiology, Hokkaido University School of Medicine, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan, and masaki@med.hokudai.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our daily experience of time is strongly influenced by internal states, such as arousal, attention, and mood. However, the underlying neuronal mechanism remains largely unknown. To investigate this, we recorded pupil diameter, which is closely linked to internal factors and neuromodulatory signaling, in monkeys performing the oculomotor version of the time production paradigm. In the self-timed saccade task, animals were required to make a memory-guided saccade during a predetermined time interval following a visual cue. We found that pupil diameter was negatively correlated with trial-by-trial latency of self-timed saccades. Because no significant correlation was found for visually guided saccades, correlation of self-timed saccades could not be explained solely by the facilitation of saccade execution. As the reward amount was manipulated, pupil diameter and saccade latency altered in opposite directions and the magnitudes of modulation correlated strongly across sessions, further supporting the close link between pupil diameter and the subjective passage of time. When the animals were trained to produce two different intervals depending on the instruction, the pupil size again correlated with the trial-by-trial variation of saccade latency in each condition; however, pupil diameter differed significantly for saccades with similar latencies generated under different conditions. Our results indicate that internal brain states indexed by pupil diameter, which parallel noradrenergic neuronal activity (Aston-Jones and Cohen, 2005), may bias trial-by-trial variation in the subjective passage of time. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Daily experience of time is strongly influenced by our internal state, but the underlying neuronal mechanism remains elusive. Here we demonstrate that pupil diameter is negatively correlated with subjective elapsed time in monkeys performing an oculomotor version of the time production task. When the animals reported two different intervals depending on the instruction, pupil size was correlated with reported timing in each condition but differed for similar timing under different conditions. Given the close correlation between pupil diameter and noradrenergic signaling reported previously, our data indicate that brain states probed by pupil diameter and noradrenergic neuronal activity might modulate subjective passage of time.

Indexed as

AnimalsFixation, OcularMacacaMaleMemoryPupilReaction TimeSaccadesStatistics as TopicTime Perceptioneye movementsmonkeyspupil diameterself-timingtemporal processing

Identifiers

PMID27807173
PMCPMC6601963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.