Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27807133›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Serotonin and arginine-vasopressin mediate sex differences in the regulation of dominance and aggression by the social brain.

Joseph I Terranova, Zhimin Song, Tony E Larkin, Nathan Hardcastle, Alisa Norvelle, Ansa Riaz, H Elliott Albers

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
17.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Dichotomous Regulation of Social Behaviors by Nucleus Accumbens Neurons in Female and Male Syrian Hamsters.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Sex differences in the neural circuitry of aggression.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. How dopamine guides our social world.Pharmacological reviews · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. TheFrontiers in psychology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joseph I TerranovaNeuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303.
Zhimin SongNeuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303.
Tony E LarkinNeuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303.
Nathan HardcastleNeuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303.
Alisa NorvelleNeuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303.
Ansa RiazNeuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303.
H Elliott AlbersNeuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303; biohea@gsu.edu.
Georgia State University · US

Funding

Sex Differences in the Social BrainR01MH110212 · NIMH · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ALBERS, H. ELLIOTT, MICHOPOULOS, VASILIKI · 2016 to 2020
$3.3M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH110212
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are profound sex differences in the incidence of many psychiatric disorders. Although these disorders are frequently linked to social stress and to deficits in social engagement, little is known about sex differences in the neural mechanisms that underlie these phenomena. Phenotypes characterized by dominance, competitive aggression, and active coping strategies appear to be more resilient to psychiatric disorders such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) compared with those characterized by subordinate status and the lack of aggressiveness. Here, we report that serotonin (5-HT) and arginine-vasopressin (AVP) act in opposite ways in the hypothalamus to regulate dominance and aggression in females and males. Hypothalamic injection of a 5-HT1a agonist stimulated aggression in female hamsters and inhibited aggression in males, whereas injection of AVP inhibited aggression in females and stimulated aggression in males. Striking sex differences were also identified in the neural mechanisms regulating dominance. Acquisition of dominance was associated with activation of 5-HT neurons within the dorsal raphe in females and activation of hypothalamic AVP neurons in males. These data strongly indicate that there are fundamental sex differences in the neural regulation of dominance and aggression. Further, because systemically administered fluoxetine increased aggression in females and substantially reduced aggression in males, there may be substantial gender differences in the clinical efficacy of commonly prescribed 5-HT-active drugs such as selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitors. These data suggest that the treatment of psychiatric disorders such as PTSD may be more effective with the use of 5-HT-targeted drugs in females and AVP-targeted drugs in males.

Indexed as

Social Dominance8-Hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralinAggressionAnimalsArginine VasopressinBehavior, AnimalFemaleFluoxetineHypothalamusMaleMesocricetusSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsSerotoninSerotonin Receptor AgonistsSex Characteristics8-Hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralinArginine VasopressinFluoxetineSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsSerotoninSerotonin Receptor Agonistsagonisticfluoxetinegender differenceshamstersocial behavior

Identifiers

PMID27807133
PMCPMC5135349
OpenAlexW2548959795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.