ArticleBMJ open2016
How do community health committees contribute to capacity building for maternal and child health? A realist evaluation protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamics in implementing the Good Financial Grant Practice standard across three African universities: an Indigenous realist evaluation.Health research policy and systems · 2025Article
- Has stakeholder participation in health facility governing committees promoted social accountability? A qualitative study in Tanzania.Global health action · 2024Article
- Realist evaluation of the impact of the research translation process on health system sustainability: a study protocol.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Advancing sustainable development goals through immunization: a literature review.Globalization and health · 2021Review
- Community mobilization to strengthen support for appropriate and timely use of antenatal and postnatal care: A review of reviews.Journal of global health · 2021Review
- Community engagement for COVID-19 prevention and control: a rapid evidence synthesis.BMJ global health · 2020Review
- Community Ownership in Primary Health Care-Managing the Intangible.Global health, science and practice · 2020Article
- How Health Promoters Can Assess Capacity Building Processes in Setting-Based Approaches-Development and Testing of a Monitoring Instrument.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Evaluation of Implementation Level of Community Health Strategy and Its Influence on Uptake of Skilled Delivery in Lurambi Sub County-Kenya.The East African health research journal · 2020Article
- Article
- Realist evaluations in low- and middle-income countries: reflections and recommendations from the experiences of a foreign researcher.BMJ global health · 2019Review
- Access to primary care for socio-economically disadvantaged older people in rural areas: exploring realist theory using structural equation modelling in a linked dataset.BMC medical research methodology · 2018Article
- Article
- The systematic approach to improving care for Frail Older Patients (SAFE) study: A protocol for co-designing a frail older person's pathway.HRB open research · 2018Article
- A study of human resource competencies required to implement community rehabilitation in less resourced settings.Human resources for health · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe proposed research is part of ongoing operations research within World Vision's Access: Infant and Maternal Health Programme. This study aims to identify key context features and underlying mechanisms through which community health committees build community capacity within the field of maternal and child health. This may help to improve programme implementation by providing contextually informed and explanatory findings for how community health committees work, what works best and for whom do they work for best for. Though frequently used within health programmes, little research is carried out on such committees' contribution to capacity building-a frequent goal or proposed outcome of these groups. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The scarce information that does exist often fails to explain 'how, why, and for whom' these committees work best. Since such groups typically operate within or as components of complex health interventions, they require a systems thinking approach and design, and thus so too does their evaluation. Using a mixed methods realist evaluation with intraprogramme case studies, this protocol details a proposed study on community health committees in rural Tanzania and Uganda to better understand underlying mechanisms through which these groups work (or do not) to build community capacity for maternal and child health. This research protocol follows the realist evaluation methodology of eliciting initial programme theories, to inform the field study design, which are detailed within. Thus far, the methodology of a realist evaluation has been well suited to the study of community health committees within these contexts. Implications for its use within these contexts are discussed within. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Institutional Review Boards and the appropriate research clearance bodies within Ireland, Uganda and Tanzania have approved this study. Planned dissemination activities include via academic and programme channels, as well as feedback to the communities in which this work occurs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.