Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27807082›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2016

How do community health committees contribute to capacity building for maternal and child health? A realist evaluation protocol.

Brynne Gilmore, Eilish McAuliffe, Fiona Larkan, Magnus Conteh, Nicola Dunne, Michele Gaudrault, Henry Mollel, Nazarius Mbona Tumwesigye, Frédérique Vallières

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Brynne GilmoreCentre for Global Health, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-4496-9254
Eilish McAuliffeSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Fiona LarkanCentre for Global Health, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Magnus ContehWorld Vision Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Nicola DunneWorld Vision Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Michele GaudraultWorld Vision International, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Henry MollelHealth Systems Management, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Nazarius Mbona TumwesigyeDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala Uganda.
Frédérique VallièresCentre for Global Health, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe proposed research is part of ongoing operations research within World Vision's Access: Infant and Maternal Health Programme. This study aims to identify key context features and underlying mechanisms through which community health committees build community capacity within the field of maternal and child health. This may help to improve programme implementation by providing contextually informed and explanatory findings for how community health committees work, what works best and for whom do they work for best for. Though frequently used within health programmes, little research is carried out on such committees' contribution to capacity building-a frequent goal or proposed outcome of these groups. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The scarce information that does exist often fails to explain 'how, why, and for whom' these committees work best. Since such groups typically operate within or as components of complex health interventions, they require a systems thinking approach and design, and thus so too does their evaluation. Using a mixed methods realist evaluation with intraprogramme case studies, this protocol details a proposed study on community health committees in rural Tanzania and Uganda to better understand underlying mechanisms through which these groups work (or do not) to build community capacity for maternal and child health. This research protocol follows the realist evaluation methodology of eliciting initial programme theories, to inform the field study design, which are detailed within. Thus far, the methodology of a realist evaluation has been well suited to the study of community health committees within these contexts. Implications for its use within these contexts are discussed within. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Institutional Review Boards and the appropriate research clearance bodies within Ireland, Uganda and Tanzania have approved this study. Planned dissemination activities include via academic and programme channels, as well as feedback to the communities in which this work occurs.

Indexed as

Capacity BuildingChild HealthMaternal HealthCommunity Health ServicesHealth SurveysHumansProgram EvaluationResearch DesignTanzaniaUgandacommunity capacity buildingcommunity health committeesmaternal and child healthoperations researchrealist evaluation

Identifiers

PMID27807082
PMCPMC5128909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.