Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27807042›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of nutrition2016

Mice Fed a High-Fat Diet Supplemented with Resistant Starch Display Marked Shifts in the Liver Metabolome Concurrent with Altered Gut Bacteria.

Dorothy A Kieffer, Brian D Piccolo, Maria L Marco, Eun Bae Kim, Michael L Goodson, Michael J Keenan, Tamara N Dunn, Knud Erik Bach Knudsen, Roy J Martin, Sean H Adams

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Liver fat metabolism of broilers regulated byFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Dorothy A KiefferGraduate Group in Nutritional Biology and.
Brian D PiccoloArkansas Children's Nutrition Center and.
Maria L MarcoFood Science and Technology Department, and.
Eun Bae KimFood Science and Technology Department, and.
Michael L GoodsonDepartment of Microbiology, University of California, Davis, CA.
Michael J KeenanLouisiana State University AgCenter, Baton Rouge, LA; and.
Tamara N DunnGraduate Group in Nutritional Biology and.
Knud Erik Bach KnudsenDepartment of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Roy J MartinGraduate Group in Nutritional Biology and rmartin@agcenter.lsu.edu shadams@uams.edu.
Sean H AdamsGraduate Group in Nutritional Biology and rmartin@agcenter.lsu.edu shadams@uams.edu.
Agricultural Research Service · USArkansas Children's Nutrition Center · USAarhus University · DKInstitute of Food Science and Technology · CNKangwon National University · KRLouisiana State University · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-amylose-maize resistant starch type 2 (HAMRS2) is a fermentable dietary fiber known to alter the gut milieu, including the gut microbiota, which may explain the reported effects of resistant starch to ameliorate obesity-associated metabolic dysfunction.

objectiveOur working hypothesis was that HAMRS2-induced microbiome changes alter gut-derived signals (i.e., xenometabolites) reaching the liver via the portal circulation, in turn altering liver metabolism by regulating gene expression and other pathways.

methodsWe used a multi-omics systems biology approach to characterize HAMRS2-driven shifts to the cecal microbiome, liver metabolome, and transcriptome, identifying correlates between microbial changes and liver metabolites under obesogenic conditions that, to our knowledge, have not previously been recognized. Five-week-old male C57BL/6J mice were fed an energy-dense 45% lard-based-fat diet for 10 wk supplemented with either 20% HAMRS2 by weight (n = 14) or rapidly digestible starch (control diet; n = 15).

resultsDespite no differences in food intake, body weight, glucose tolerance, fasting plasma insulin, or liver triglycerides, the HAMRS2 mice showed a 15-58% reduction in all measured liver amino acids, except for Gln, compared with control mice. These metabolites were equivalent in the plasma of HAMRS2 mice compared with controls, and transcripts encoding key amino acid transporters were not different in the small intestine or liver, suggesting that HAMRS2 effects were not simply due to lower hepatocyte exposure to systemic amino acids. Instead, alterations in gut microbial metabolism could have affected host nitrogen and amino acid homeostasis: HAMRS2 mice showed a 62% increase (P < 0.0001) in 48-h fecal output and a 41% increase (P < 0.0001) in fecal nitrogen compared with control mice. Beyond amino acid metabolism, liver transcriptomics revealed pathways related to lipid and xenobiotic metabolism; and pathways related to cell proliferation, differentiation, and growth were affected by HAMRS2 feeding.

conclusionTogether, these differences indicate that HAMRS2 dramatically alters hepatic metabolism and gene expression concurrent with shifts in specific gut bacteria in C57BL/6J mice.

Indexed as

AdiposityAnimalsBacteriaDietary FatsGastrointestinal TractLiverMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLObesityRandom AllocationStarchDietary FatsStarchdietary fibergut microbiotalivermetabolomicstranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID27807042
PMCPMC5118768
OpenAlexW2546839000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.