Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27806695›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2016

Insights into the innate immunome of actiniarians using a comparative genomic approach.

Chloé A van der Burg, Peter J Prentis, Joachim M Surm, Ana Pavasovic

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Transcriptomics of theEcology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Toxin-like neuropeptides in the sea anemoneProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chloé A van der BurgSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, Qld, 4000, Australia. chloe.vanderburg@hdr.qut.edu.au.
Peter J PrentisSchool of Earth, Environmental and Biological Sciences, Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, Qld, 4000, Australia.
Joachim M SurmSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, Qld, 4000, Australia.
Ana PavasovicSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, Qld, 4000, Australia.
Queensland University of Technology · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInnate immune genes tend to be highly conserved in metazoans, even in early divergent lineages such as Cnidaria (jellyfish, corals, hydroids and sea anemones) and Porifera (sponges). However, constant and diverse selection pressures on the immune system have driven the expansion and diversification of different immune gene families in a lineage-specific manner. To investigate how the innate immune system has evolved in a subset of sea anemone species (Order: Actiniaria), we performed a comprehensive and comparative study using 10 newly sequenced transcriptomes, as well as three publically available transcriptomes, to identify the origins, expansions and contractions of candidate and novel immune gene families.

resultsWe characterised five conserved genes and gene families, as well as multiple novel innate immune genes, including the newly recognised putative pattern recognition receptor CniFL. Single copies of TLR, MyD88 and NF-κB were found in most species, and several copies of IL-1R-like, NLR and CniFL were found in almost all species. Multiple novel immune genes were identified with domain architectures including the Toll/interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) homology domain, which is well documented as functioning in protein-protein interactions and signal transduction in immune pathways. We hypothesise that these genes may interact as novel proteins in immune pathways of cnidarian species. Novelty in the actiniarian immunome is not restricted to only TIR-domain-containing proteins, as we identify a subset of NLRs which have undergone neofunctionalisation and contain 3-5 N-terminal transmembrane domains, which have so far only been identified in two anthozoan species.

conclusionsThis research has significance in understanding the evolution and origin of the core eumetazoan gene set, including how novel innate immune genes evolve. For example, the evolution of transmembrane domain containing NLRs indicates that these NLRs may be membrane-bound, while all other metazoan and plant NLRs are exclusively cytosolic receptors. This is one example of how species without an adaptive immune system may evolve innovative solutions to detect pathogens or interact with native microbiota. Overall, these results provide an insight into the evolution of the innate immune system, and show that early divergent lineages, such as actiniarians, have a diverse repertoire of conserved and novel innate immune genes.

Indexed as

GenomeGenomicsAnimalsComputational BiologyEpistasis, GeneticEvolution, MolecularGene Expression ProfilingGene OntologyImmunity, InnateMultigene FamilyNeuronal Apoptosis-Inhibitory ProteinPhylogenyReproducibility of ResultsSea AnemonesTranscriptomeNeuronal Apoptosis-Inhibitory ProteinActiniariaCniFLComplement cascadeEvolutionInnate immune systemNLRNovel immune genesTIR domainTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID27806695
PMCPMC5094078
OpenAlexW2548416339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.